Results 21 to 23 of 23
Hybrid View
-
01-10-2008, 04:47 PM #1
OPSenior Member
Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.
1-7-08: Silvestro the Cat & New Hampshire Elections
UPDATE JAN 9 9am PST: TOWN OF SUTTON CONFIRMS RON PAUL TOTALS WERE 31, NOT ZERO.
I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human error.
This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results.
A Web site here: Where's The Voter-verifiable Paper Trail for each ballot cast? has more on fraud techniques with hand counted paper ballots. You'll have to dig for it -- or Google, and the excellent research on this is Theresa Hommel from the state of New York.
Black Box Voting - Welcome to www.BlackBoxVoting.org, Citizen center for elections oversightepxroot Reviewed by epxroot on . Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere. UPDATE - Sutton ZERO vote anomaly - Ron Paul Forums Rating: 5
-
01-11-2008, 05:56 AM #2
Senior Member
Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.
New Hampshire Recount On The Cards Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, January 10, 2008
New Hampshire Republican candidate Albert Howard is prepared to put his name behind a primary recount in order to ascertain if the example of "human error" in the town of Sutton, where Ron Paul was originally given zero votes, was an isolated case or if wider vote fraud took place.
The move is also being backed by the "Granny Warriors," a Ron Paul supporters group. Alex Jones has agreed to throw his full support behind the demand for a recount.
The following statement appears on the Granny Warriors website, along with a donation toll for raising the necessary $65,000 to fund the recount.
With all the strange events going on in the primary and with solid statements of actual fraud in NH everyone is calling for a recount which should be take care of by the Campaign staff but that isn't going to happen it seems.If fraud is uncovered in the Republican primary it may also throw the Democratic result into doubt, especially as suspicions are widespread about how Hillary Clinton managed to overturn a 13 point pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama.
Therefore... we the Grassroots will fund our own recount for Dr. Paul.
Every cent will be put toward the recounting and we will just see if we can stir up enough attention to really get a good count now. Perhaps it will also give notice to other states not to mess with the counts.
Lets get this done before it is too late and facts and figures can be altered.
-
01-11-2008, 05:57 AM #3
Senior Member
Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.










Register To Reply
Staff Online