Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
13896 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1.     
    #11
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    Clear Evidence Of Widespread Vote Fraud In New Hampshire
    Paul and Obama cheated out of 3rd and 1st by voting machines, hand count fraud Paul Joseph Watson
    Prison Planet
    Wednesday, January 9, 2008

    [align=left]There were several major vote fraud issues to arise out of the New Hampshire primary revolving mainly around Ron Paul and Barack Obama, who were both seemingly cheated out of third and first places respectively as a result of rigged Diebold voting machines and deliberate malfeasance in the counting of hand-written paper ballots.
    - Obama had a 13 to 15 point lead over Hillary Clinton heading into the primary. Nothing occured that boosted Hillary's numbers immediately before the election, in fact immediately after the staged crying incident, many pundits argued it could only have harmed her chances. And yet Hillary somehow managed to instigate a near 20 point swing to defeat Obama by three per cent. If not for her 7% swing as a result of Diebold voting machines, Hillary would have lost to Obama. If Obama was struggling he would probably contest this bizarre outcome, but he is likely to accept the results simply to save face.
    - The New Hampshire town of Sutton admits that it voided every vote Ron Paul received. The Congressman got 31 votes and yet due to a "human error," Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul. How "human error" can explain not counting 31 votes in succession for one single candidate is beyond the pale and Ron Paul's campaign should ask for a recount across New Hampshire immediately.
    - As soon as people went public with the fact that their votes in Sutton had not been counted, other districts where Paul had supposedly received zero votes, such as Greenville, suddenly changed their final tallies and attributed votes to the Congressman. [/align]
    [align=left](Article continues below)

    [/align]




    - Going into New Hampshire Ron Paul was polling in the early teens and was a strong bet to take third place behind McCain and Romney. Four days before the vote, Rasmussen had Paul at 14% - a significant lead over Huckabee on 11% and Giuliani on 8% - and yet Ron Paul finished with just 8%. Proof of clear vote fraud, allied with the fact that Paul's numbers show a 6% swing from normally accurate pre-polling forecasts, clearly indicate chicanery was at hand, especially considering the fact that Paul lost those crucial few percentage points to Giuliani as a reuslt of electronic Diebold voting machines which are known to be wide open to tampering and fraud.



    [align=left]- Going purely on hand-counts, which as we saw in Sutton were by no means angelic but at least harder to cheat on than Diebold voting machines without getting caught, Ron Paul would have won 15% of the vote and finished third. This figure would have more accurately correlated to the pre-primary polls rather than the ridiculous 8% he was eventually given.
    - Numerous districts reported totals of anything up to 22% for "other candidates". What on earth does this black hole of "other candidates" mean? How can one vote for a candidate that is not on the ballot without spoiling the ballot paper? The district of Lisbon reported 22.5% votes for this mysterious "other" candidate, while in the large district of Londonderry, the "other" candidate received 10%. Many are now alleging that these "other" votes were merely siphoned from Ron Paul to keep his final number low.
    - Rudy Giuliani, the 9/11 candidate who beat Ron Paul thanks to the aid of a 3% swing on Diebold voting machines, received 9.11% of the vote in three different towns. Coincidence or somebody's idea of a sick joke?[/align]

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #12
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    first hand example that our votes still dont mean shit. if they are already having problems with the primaries, immagin whats going to happen when the election comes around.

  4.     
    #13
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    Look, I know that America is a time in it's life where some change could help tremendously, but Ron Paul has no chance, so please stop flooding cannibis.com with your well intended but completely useless debates and or discussions about RP and the good he will do for America...........:stoned:
    [align=center]R.I.P.[/align]
    [align=center]Matt Seering[/align]
    [align=center]You\'ve gone on to a better place![/align]
    [align=center]:abduct:[/align]

  5.     
    #14
    Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    I TOTALLY AGREE

  6.     
    #15
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
    .....seems damn funny that Ron hasn't made a statement.
    Agreed.
    More of the same: Renger\'s Rantings

  7.     
    #16
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    [align=center]R.I.P.[/align]
    [align=center]Matt Seering[/align]
    [align=center]You\'ve gone on to a better place![/align]
    [align=center]:abduct:[/align]

  8.     
    #17
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    3 threads on this "so called" conspiracy? Come on now people, somebodys not reading. It's all merged here for your viewing pleasure.........

    Have a good one!:jointsmile:

  9.     
    #18
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    A good example of democracy here ldg420 just having a look but this is the politics forum if a can.com member wants to debate & others are interested in it I don't think its your place to tell them they can't. If an admin finds the topic breaches the forum rules I'm sure they wil do something about it. If you don't like the debate you can always choose not to read it. But IMHO in politics when someone asserts you can't its really just because they don't want you to.

  10.     
    #19
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    This is crap..Gotta love American government pause, not.

  11.     
    #20
    Senior Member

    Wonder if this is happpening elsewhere.

    1-7-08: Silvestro the Cat & New Hampshire Elections
    UPDATE JAN 9 9am PST: TOWN OF SUTTON CONFIRMS RON PAUL TOTALS WERE 31, NOT ZERO.

    I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human error.

    This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results.

    A Web site here: Where's The Voter-verifiable Paper Trail for each ballot cast? has more on fraud techniques with hand counted paper ballots. You'll have to dig for it -- or Google, and the excellent research on this is Theresa Hommel from the state of New York.

    Black Box Voting - Welcome to www.BlackBoxVoting.org, Citizen center for elections oversight

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook