Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton : Two Families, Three Decades In The White House...

[pisshead]

Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton : Two Families, Three Decades In The White House, The Very Best Of Friends YOUR NEW REALITY
Tuesday December 18, 2007


Hillary Clinton likes to give the impression that she stands utterly opposed to President George W. Bush, and that she believes he has ruined the United States during his seven years in power.

But it's all a lie. The Clintons and the Bushes are really the best of friends, as we pointed out on this blog almost two years ago.

Such good friends in fact, that Bill Clinton has announced that his wife's "number one priority" on taking control of the White House would be to send him and former President George H.W. Bush on a world tour to declare the United States is "open for business and cooperation":

Former President Bill Clinton said Monday that the first thing his wife Hillary will do when she reaches the White House is dispatch him and his predecessor, President George H.W. Bush, on an around-the-world mission to repair the damage done to America's reputation by the current president - Bush's son, George W. Bush.

"Well, the first thing she intends to do, because you can do this without passing a bill, the first thing she intends to do is to send me and former President Bush and a number of other people around the world to tell them that America is open for business and cooperation again," Clinton said in response to a question from a supporter about what his wife's "number one priority" would be as president.

Her "number one priority", eh? Sure, nothing more important than bilking the US taxpayers for a victory lap of the world by the Bush-Clinton 'family' regime.

And this announcement is supposed to help Hillary Clinton get elected?

Are these people insane?


They're supposed to be enemies. But they're really good friends

More than 40% of Americans have never known the White House without a Clinton or Bush in the West Wing. Fatigue and nervousness amongst young American voters of what the president himself called "Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton" is now one of the biggest hurdles Hillary Clinton has to overcome, but more likely than not the families will find a way to install her in the West Wing at the end of next year.

So Bill and Hillary Clinton are now claiming that President George W. Bush has screwed up the country so badly that he, Pappa Bush and a host of other dignitaries will have to tour the world to announce that the bad times are over?

How fascinating it is to see that not so long ago, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush were sharing quality phone time on how to run the White House.

From YNR, January 2006 :

Mr Bush said he checked in with Mr Clinton occasionally. "And you know, he says things that make it obvious â?¦ that we're kind of, you know, on the same wavelength about the job of the presidency," he said.

And what "wavelength" is that? President Bush didn't explain.

And now, less than two years later, Bill Clinton is announcing that if his wife wins the White House, he will be sent on a diplomatic mission to try and undo the damage done by his "brother" George W.?

Please. How stupid do these people think we are?

More on the very close relationships in the Bush-Clinton Presidential Family :

US President George W. Bush thinks it's funny that Senator Hilary Clinton could be the next President of the United States.

Despite the fact that both her and her husband Bill Clinton have savaged the Bush 2 Administration, and mocked the President for being dumb and careless and out of touch, there are no hard feelings from the Bush Family.

Bill Clinton spends an awful amount of time doing charity gigs with his former rival and fellow ex-President George Herbert Walker Bush. They've become great friends and current President Bush thinks of Bill as a member of the family now.

"That's a good relationship," Bush said of his dad's flourishing mateship with "my new brother".

President Bush thought it was "fun" to watch his father and Clinton together at the funeral of Pope John Paul.

When asked about who might be the next President of the United States, Bush mused about how future historians might look back and view the decades when only a few key members of two old American families held the most powerful office in the world as "Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton", he said.

Who needs elections?

The Bush-Clinton Family Album : W. On Bill "He's My Brother"

pisshead Reviewed by pisshead on 12-19-2007. Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton : Two Families, Three Decades In The White House... Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton : Two Families, Three Decades In The White House, The Very Best Of Friends YOUR NEW REALITY Tuesday December 18, 2007 http://bp3.blogger.com/_9gn6KLa5xtY/R2fujD7250I/AAAAAAAABJc/qpZ_XbNGsB0/s400/BushesClintonsLaughItUp2.jpg Hillary Clinton likes to give the impression that she stands utterly opposed to President George W. Bush, and that she believes he has ruined the United States during Rating: 5

[SFGurrilla]

Its the Illumniti.

[Ramulux]

That is just the worst idea ever.

[dragonrider]

A Clinton will now have to marry a Bush in order to consolidate the dynasty. Of course that will also result in a breach of the seventh seal, and all the demons of hell will spill forth to devour the earth...

[Nailhead]

Please. How stupid do these people think we are?

What I learned in the last election is this: "Never under-estimate the stupidity of common Americans."

You would think after a president dangerously invades another country, kills their leader, and looses any sort of control in that country that Americans would elect a different leader, well, at least I thought so, then Kerry lost...

It is happening again, despite Clinton's lack of serious experience, her close relations with the creators of our broken health care system, and lack of any sort of morals within her family that Americans would reject this horrible choice for commander in chief, however people are easily mislead to believe the exact opposite is true.

I wish I could be honest and say, "It's ok, even if she wins the primaries, there is no way she can win the general election". However, all the mass media needs to do is keep a candidate hidden, that while would be very popular among many republicans, would be so hated by democrats and independents that they would prefer a female Satan over 4 more years with another right wing Christian nutjob. I am, of course, talking about the rise in popularity of Mike Huckabee. Everything is playing out oh, so perfectly. The media is feeding everything in piece by piece, and nobody is smart enough to put the God damn puzzle together. But then again, maybe I'm just another Ron Paul conspiracy nut....let's see if what I said doesn't happen to a T these next few months...

[Innominate]

What I learned in the last election is this: "Never under-estimate the stupidity of common Americans."

You would think after a president dangerously invades another country, kills their leader, and looses any sort of control in that country that Americans would elect a different leader, well, at least I thought so, then Kerry lost...

It is happening again, despite Clinton's lack of serious experience, her close relations with the creators of our broken health care system, and lack of any sort of morals within her family that Americans would reject this horrible choice for commander in chief, however people are easily mislead to believe the exact opposite is true.

I wish I could be honest and say, "It's ok, even if she wins the primaries, there is no way she can win the general election". However, all the mass media needs to do is keep a candidate hidden, that while would be very popular among many republicans, would be so hated by democrats and independents that they would prefer a female Satan over 4 more years with another right wing Christian nutjob. I am, of course, talking about the rise in popularity of Mike Huckabee. Everything is playing out oh, so perfectly. The media is feeding everything in piece by piece, and nobody is smart enough to put the God damn puzzle together. But then again, maybe I'm just another Ron Paul conspiracy nut....let's see if what I said doesn't happen to a T these next few months...

I know, but these people have such a likely chance of making fools of themselves, especially when they are confronted by past mistakes, and their numbers drop. They can get all the support from the religious and media corporations, but you know who has the people's support. When it all goes down, one will be superior over the other. What is irritating is when religion becomes incorporated into media. Religious propaganda is not America.

[Nailhead]

I know, but these people have such a likely chance of making fools of themselves, especially when they are confronted by past mistakes, and their numbers drop. They can get all the support from the religious and media corporations, but you know who has the people's support. When it all goes down, one will be superior over the other. What is irritating is when religion becomes incorporated into media. Religious propaganda is not America.

I disagree that these people's past mistakes negatively harm their poll numbers. The Bush's and Clinton's have made disastrous mistakes, that if people actually were paying attention, neither would have any support at all. The simple fact that over half of democrats think Clinton being wife of a likable, yet not so perfect, president equates to experience is proof enough that people are believing the crap they are being fed. I also disagree that you don't think religious propaganda is not American, I disagree with this completely. I wish it weren't true, but this country is believed by the majority of Americans to have been settled into a Christian society so many believe it should always be that way, despite the constitution's clear instructions to keep religion separate from American government, or the fact that references to God on our money and in our pledge of allegiance were only added recently.

Religion has, and always will, be very closely tied to any person desiring power, IE, US Presidents. If this weren't true, then the issue would not come up because people would not care about a president's religion, but they do. Even if the voter isn't a perfect model for that popular religion, they always will want their leader to at least look more perfect than they try to be. So rather than waste the time and energy at researching each candidate, they just look for the one that sounds like someone God would want and wherever they take this country is justified under the glory of God.

Again, I wish this wasn't true and religion wasn't important when selecting a president of the United States, but I also wish Santa Claus would ride his fat ass down my chimney next week and leave presents under my Christmas tree. Don't think that'll happen though :stoned:

[angry nomad]

Well fuck. I knew a lot of this for awhile, but not all of it.

I just watched, "An Unreasonable Man" about Ralph Nader. It was pretty badass. The DNC and GOP sent a cop out into the parking lot of their debates threatening to arrest him for trespassing. The General Election debates are run by the Democrats and Republicans. They basically said he was not a contender, so they would not give him a place on stage. When he tried to attend and sit in the audience, they threatened him with a thug of the law. So, he was not a contender, but they felt threatened by him. He was not a contender, but the Democrats blamed Gore's and Kerry's losses on him.

I joined the Green Party after Bush got "elected" the second time. I was going to vote for Nader, but I was afraid of Bush getting elected so I voted for Kerry, hoping he would end the war. John "Long Devil" Kerry conceded the election to his fellow Bonesman, George "Temporary" Bush.

I registered Republican to vote for Ron Paul.

[Psycho4Bud]

So what I get from this is that if you disagree with a portion of a persons political beliefs/practices, that you can't be "friends" or at least sociable?

One of my best friends has FULL intention of voting for Hillary......does this mean I can't share a joint with him now?

Have a good one!:s4:

[420izzle]

^Hey P4B...I think it means we have the duty to inform our friends and family that these folks are not fit to lead this Republic. They are criminals.

I also have friends that support Hillary. I gave them some information, similar to what Pisshead has so generously shared, and some of them have changed their tune. A couple now support Ron Paul! A total switcharoo from slavery and socialism to freedom and liberty...peace and prosperity. BUT, the friends that still looove Hitlery - well, we share joints and so much other stuff in commom, it's all good.