Sorry if you took this all so personally because I wasn't trying to attack you, but rather attack your political statements. I only criticized your education after you presented it as part of your support for your statements, I only considered this as part of the political debate we were having, nothing personal. If you took it that way, then I am sorry.

But back on topic...
As for phone polling, another reason it's not very accurate for showing Ron Paul's support is that it is one thing to have somebody call you and ask you about your political opinions. I know a lot of people that while they can give a definite answer to who they support, the question of if they will actually vote is another issue. Many will not, but I would say most Ron Paul supporters understand how important the primaries are and know the dates of when and where they need to be. Most people, that vote at least, only vote in the general elections. The primaries are usually for people that are more involved in politics than others, and while people in early states might be more excited to be involved with the countries future, I'm not convinced other states have people just as interested.

I don't think Ron Paul is a majority, I'm guessing it's probably more like 12%, but while Giuliani might have 21.5%, maybe only 20% of those supporters will actually go and vote in the primaries, whereas Ron Paul might have a mere 12%, but 99.9% of his supporters will be bright and early at their states polling location.

It's just a theory of course, but I do think it is something to consider because many republicans are not really thrilled with any of the candidates and may not vote at all because of that.