US Intelligence report concludes Iran is NOT developing nuclear weapons

[delusionsofNORMALity]

one can only hope i got it right this time. probably not.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCim7mmLWRA[/YOUTUBE]

[Staurm]

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Nuclear report a victory - Iran

"The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, said Iran had been "somewhat vindicated"."

Looks like the war hawks will have to find another reason to justify their imperialist crusade, or maybe they could just resort to the old tried and tested method of telling the same lies until they get enough stupid people to follow them....

[Psycho4Bud]

Looks like the war hawks will have to find another reason to justify their imperialist crusade, or maybe they could just resort to the old tried and tested method of telling the same lies until they get enough stupid people to follow them....

Never mind that they're still enriching uranium......so tell me, what do ya use enriched uranium for if your NOT producing energy?

Seems to me the "stupid people" are the ones wearing blinders. You have the leader of a nation waiting for (The Mahdi) a dude to come out of a well, which won't happen untill the end of times, and has stated that a neighbor should be wiped off the map but hell, lets give this asshole the benifit of the doubt huh?

A religious fanatic enriching uranium.......Isn't that SPECIAL.:wtf:

Have a good one!:s4:

[Nightcrewman]

Once more I find it massively hypocritical that the country with the biggest nuclear arsenal and the only country to ever use them is trying to dictate who may or may not develop them.

It's typical of Americas attitude of do as we say not as we do.

It's much better to have the biggest gun in my opinion, even though I have a big gun does not mean I want people with little guns shooting at me so the obvious solution is not to let them have any.
Just my tuppence worth.

NCM

[Psycho4Bud]

Another thing regarding this.......since when does the left believe ANYTHING that U.S. intelligence has to say. Hey, use the information when it fits your agenda and discard it when it don't.

Have a good one!:s4:

[Balkey]

I love you delusions. End of story.:hippy::hippy:

:joint1::4::4:

[delusionsofNORMALity]

I love you delusions. End of story.:hippy::hippy:

:joint1::4::4:

thanks

i need all the help i can get. the shrinks all say i'm a lost cause, but i still think there's a glimmer of hope at the end of my tunnel.:hippy:

[420izzle]

This reinforces Ron Paulâ??s position that a pre-emptive attack on Iran â?? an option advocated by other GOP presidential candidates and DEMS â?? would be unwise and unwarranted.

Congressman Paul issued the following statement in response to the report:

â??We needlessly and foolishly threaten Iran even though they have no nuclear weapons. I find it incomprehensible that as the failure of our Iraq policy becomes more evident, some want the same kind of policy toward Iran. A policy of peace, trade and diplomacy, is superior.â?�

The reportâ??s finding that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 supports Congressman Paulâ??s view that military action against Iran is contrary to American national security. The report found that any Iranian nuclear weapon capability is not imminent, and noted that the State Departmentâ??s Bureau of Intelligence and Research judges that Iran is unlikely to have the capability to produce a nuclear weapon before 2013.

â??While candidates with virtually zero foreign policy experience like Rudy Giuliani are advocating escalation, Dr. Paul â?? an Air Force veteran and member of the House Foreign Relations Committee â?? has been a staunch opponent of expanding war into Iran,â?� said Ron Paul spokesman Jesse Benton. â??More than any other candidate, Ron Paul understands that America cannot afford to make the same mistakes with Iran that were made with Iraq.â?�

GO DR. PAUL

[Captain Jack Sparrow]

I'd much rather live under an American "do as we say not as we do" policy regarding nuclear weapons than fairly letting EVERYONE under the sun have them.

Love us or hate us, we are NOT the ones you should be worrying about, but any Middle Eastern country having the ability to produce a nuclear weapon. They are clearly not ready. The Middle East is a hotbed for terrorism and dictators and all sorts of anti-freedom. Let them live in the 17th century if they want but like hell should they have any sort of nuclear military power!

[Balkey]

I'd much rather live under an American "do as we say not as we do" policy regarding nuclear weapons than fairly letting EVERYONE under the sun have them.

Love us or hate us, we are NOT the ones you should be worrying about, but any Middle Eastern country having the ability to produce a nuclear weapon. They are clearly not ready. The Middle East is a hotbed for terrorism and dictators and all sorts of anti-freedom. Let them live in the 17th century if they want but like hell should they have any sort of nuclear military power!

Agreed. We as Americans, only look at the negative aspects of our government and never take a second to realize how much we take for granted our freedoms, lifestyles, and luxuries that present themselves on a daily basis. I, for one, would like to fight terrorism in another country, rather my own. Even though its here, obviously, our daily lives are much safer than those in some third world countries and I'd like to keep it that way. I don't know about you, but I don't think I'd like getting nuked.

:stoned::stoned::stoned: