Results 11 to 17 of 17
-
11-25-2007, 07:51 PM #11
Senior Member
Which would you rather have?
I'd get rid of the legs - arms are much more important to everyday life. Although legs are too - obviously, but you cant eat with your legs or pick things up or move things around properly.
-
11-26-2007, 12:40 AM #12
Senior Member
Which would you rather have?
I'd sacrifice the legs, too. i could wheel around and still use my arms to pet my dogs or eat or wash myself. I could still be reasonably self-sufficient. I'm in trouble if you use a chainsaw on me, though, Geo. I take blood thinners.
[SIZE=\"4\"]\"That best portion of a good man\'s life: his little, nameless, unremembered acts of kindness and love.\"[/SIZE]
[align=center]William Wordsworth, English poet (1770 - 1850)[/align]
-
11-26-2007, 12:42 AM #13
Senior Member
Which would you rather have?
i'd keep my arms...as pointed out already, life is much harder with no arms rather then no legs...
legs are mostly used for transportation... which is easily enough remedied...
-
11-26-2007, 12:57 AM #14
Senior Member
Which would you rather have?
Lose the legs, no question
-
11-26-2007, 04:03 AM #15
OPSenior Member
Which would you rather have?
I dont even own a chainsaw.
-
11-26-2007, 04:06 AM #16
Senior Member
Which would you rather have?
meh, i can go without my tiny arms.. haha
-
11-26-2007, 04:23 AM #17
Senior Member
Which would you rather have?
my long sexy legs
I need my nails








Register To Reply
Staff Online