Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
12645 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1.     
    #11
    Senior Member

    Which would you rather have?

    I'd get rid of the legs - arms are much more important to everyday life. Although legs are too - obviously, but you cant eat with your legs or pick things up or move things around properly.

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #12
    Senior Member

    Which would you rather have?

    I'd sacrifice the legs, too. i could wheel around and still use my arms to pet my dogs or eat or wash myself. I could still be reasonably self-sufficient. I'm in trouble if you use a chainsaw on me, though, Geo. I take blood thinners.
    [SIZE=\"4\"]\"That best portion of a good man\'s life: his little, nameless, unremembered acts of kindness and love.\"[/SIZE]
    [align=center]William Wordsworth, English poet (1770 - 1850)[/align]

  4.     
    #13
    Senior Member

    Which would you rather have?

    i'd keep my arms...as pointed out already, life is much harder with no arms rather then no legs...

    legs are mostly used for transportation... which is easily enough remedied...

  5.     
    #14
    Senior Member

    Which would you rather have?

    Lose the legs, no question

  6.     
    #15
    Senior Member

    Which would you rather have?

    I dont even own a chainsaw.

  7.     
    #16
    Senior Member

    Which would you rather have?

    meh, i can go without my tiny arms.. haha

  8.     
    #17
    Senior Member

    Which would you rather have?

    my long sexy legs

    I need my nails

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook