if we were to all take an eye for an eye, we would all be blind.

i think the uk law is one of the best in the world. but it is often subject to so many rushed polices and knee jerked reactions due to 'the angry mob' that it often results in policies that are easily exploited, lenient and non sensical. whilst often the well thought out and radical changes take too long or are not part of the party polical agenda to get passed.

i think the right to defend yourself is one that britain needs, but would always come under scruitiney as it is an easy card to pull. however in the case and the particular incidents relating to your freinds case something does need to be done.

i am reminded of the kids that broke into the farmers house who ended up getting shot. to show the irony that the law often protects those who have no care or disregard for it.

the flip side to this is that no matter the circumstances, can taking someones life ever go unpunished. is it just a line that no matter what the circumstances, once crossed is worthy of retribution?

however i do not belive in the death penalty. i think though that a three strikes ruling should be implemented for the under 25's for crimes under murder and rape that causes them to be drafted.

i think however the right to bare arms under a constitution is wrong and am glad this country has the right agenda on that.