No, the video would not work if you switched the two arguments.

Evolution is a theory built on observation of the natural world and a logical explanation for what is observed. Creationism/ID is not. The strength of creationism/ID arguments is primarily that evolutionary theory does not FULLY explain all of the observed phenomena. Creationism/ID arguments work by poking holes in evolutionary theory and then filling those holes with God or an "intelligent designer." So creationism/ID does not stand on its own merits, it relies on the weakness of evolutionary theory.

As the video points out, that line of reasoning is a logical fallacy. A hole in one theory does not translate into greater weight for an alternative theory. That kind of logical fallacy could be used to support any kind of alternative theory, even those that are patently absurd, such as the Flying Spaghetti Monster. The alternative theory must stand on its own merits.

So the video would not work if you switched the two theories. Evolutionary theory DOES stand on it's own merits --- there are logical arguments based on empirical evidence FOR evolutionary theory, so it does not rely on the same logical fallacy that creationism/ID does. It does not in any way rely on holes in the creationism/ID arguments. In order for creationism/ID to be interchangeable with evolution in the video, creationism/ID would have to also have logical arguments based on empirical evidence FOR its conclusions and not rely on holes in evolutionary theory.

I'm not going to get into the logical arguments and empirical evidence FOR evolutionary theory in this thread, because they are so well covered in other threads. But I will assert that if you go check the arguments in those threads, or better yet, research outside this forum, you will find plenty of empirical evidence for the theory.

And I will also assert that if you search those same threads or search outside this forum, you will not find empirical evidence FOR an intelligent designer. The most you will find are examples of phenomena that supporters of creationism/ID claim are not explained by evolutionary theory, and the claim that those holes in evolutionary theory are evidence in favor of creationism/ID.