I don't think he was meaning to insult the maker of this video, as much as he was simply pointing out that everything found in this video could be applied to the illogical fallacies in evolutionists theories. The video maker is completely entitled to his opinions, and he's right about one thing: creationists can't prove him wrong without resorting to religious texts of their own personal belief system. But, when you go and make a statement that "an evolutionist doesn't need address a creationists arguments directly, they need only point out that they consider these arguments to be illogical..." you instantly lose much credibility, and just come off as being obstinate.

It's just as logical (or illogical) for one to assume that they were created by an intelligent designer as it is to assume - and without empirical proof - that this beautiful world, with all of its many complexities, was designed by random chance and brought forth by an enormous galactic explosion which was generated from nothingness. Both seem to be fallible propositions, and both could be entirely wrong for all we know. Maybe the Flying Spaghetti Monster DID create everything we see and know. And I'm sure that those who faithfully & respectfully adhered to this theory will one day be welcomed into Meatball Heaven with open noodles! But there's no reason to openly bash another persons beliefs just because you believe them to be wrong. You can civilly debate against your opposition, but we all know that these debates rarely remain civil for very long...and this applies to both sides of the debate.

Think about it...I could practically re-make this entire video, replace "creationist" with "evolutionist", and get the same response from creationists that this video is getting from evolutionists. That doesn't make it any more "logically infallible", quite the opposite actually, it makes it equally as unfeasible for all the same reasons.