Results 1 to 7 of 7
Hybrid View
-
10-28-2007, 10:17 PM #1
Senior Member
the Wonderbag
Very good point, sir. Actually 2. You beat me to both of them! Excellent +rep!
Originally Posted by 420_24/7
I'm kinda high :smokin: anyway, the majority of the studies, whether government, or NORML always seem to use low grade stuff, like avg of 2.5% in which most of it would absorb rather quickly. But even so, from long periods of time ago, it was common sense to hold smoke in for 30 sec or so. I personally hold for 30 and I do indeed do notice a difference. This is not oxygen deprivation however. Swimmers often hold their breaths for much longer than 30 seconds and do not experience oxygen deprivation or a loss of brain cells. That takes more than a minute... so other than possibly absorbing more toxins, I don't think its that bad. Who the hell smokes that shit they study anyway? Therefor studies = rather biased.
Anyway, I don't think your balloon is doing much, other than oxygen deprivation though. You said you are inhaling and exhaling and repeating... how many times? Each time, the balloon contains more carbon dioxide and less oxygen. Not too good bro.
peacemelodious fellow Reviewed by melodious fellow on . the Wonderbag Today I read some archived message board posts on some other site about exhaling into a balloon during a session and breathing it back out and into the balloon repeatedly. Just a little while ago I took the bag from a bag of Wonder bread cheeseburger buns and ran it through a cap from those Baby Bottle Pop candies with the smallest reservoir tip kind of thing sawn off. The bag flowed from the smaller, sawn off opening, out of the larger end, where it would screw on to a baby's bottle if it were Rating: 5










Register To Reply
Staff Online