Iran vows 'decisive' relatiation

[Anubis10012007]

The US would really suffer economically if it attacks Iran. With our situation in Iraq and general opposition to involvement in Iraq by other major nations such as France and Germany, it would not be a good idea. Oil would be up to at least $170-$200 per barrel. Our currency is failing as it is. We should back it up in gold standard right now! Don't have the US do Israel's work.

[Markass]

If only the issue was as simple as that. The problem here is what they do in their country could have long range effects on the world as a whole. Let these crazy ass Mullahs get a nuke and all hell will break loose.

Have a good one!:s4:

you think they don't already have nukes? I'm sure they have a nice arsenal of nuclear weapons just waiting patiently for our stupid fucking government to attack them...

what do you think decisive relatiation really meant when he said it?

[Delta9 UK]

Back door deals with Russia and China - be sure

Remember that Putin has Quadrupled militairy spending since his Gas/Oil bonanza

[texas grass]

iran has every right to have nuclear power like most other countrys around them.

since we give so much shit to iran about wanting nuclear power, we should give as much shit around the world to countries that dont respect the iaea(LIKE ISRAEL)

why should iran not have nukes if israel, pakistan, most of europe, india, china, russia, ect. have nukes and america and israel threatens with nukes

LETS NOT FORGET AMERICA IS THE ONLY COUNTRY TO USE A FULL SCALE NUKE BOMB, AND ISRAEL USED NUCLEAR DEBRIS BUNKER BUSTING BOMBS IN LEBANON LAST YEAR.

so us two countries are the only countries that i know of using nuclear bombs and that is a crime against the international community

I THINK ANY COUNTRY HAS THE RIGHT TO NUCLEAR POWER, THAT IS THEIR FUCKING HUMAN RIGHT, IT ISNT UP TO AMERICA TO DECIDE WHO HAS WHAT

[Psycho4Bud]

you think they don't already have nukes? I'm sure they have a nice arsenal of nuclear weapons just waiting patiently for our stupid fucking government to attack them...

what do you think decisive relatiation really meant when he said it?

No, I don't think that they do have nukes yet but I do believe that it is their intention to get them.

"Decisive retatliation" speaks for itself.....the French President said basically the same thing.


For all those that think it's just the big, bad U.S.A.:

Germany, Britain, France and the United States have persuaded a reluctant Russia and China to back two rounds of sanctions against Iran at the U.N. Security Council.
Javno - World

President Sarkozy called Iranâ??s nuclear ambition the worldâ??s most dangerous problem yesterday and raised the possibility that the country could be bombed if it persisted in building an atomic weapon.
Sarkozy talks of bombing if Iran gets nuclear arms - Times Online

In her weekly podcast Saturday, Merkel underlined that one topic of the meeting would be ``how to deal with Iran and the necessity of new sanctions'' _ a source of potential friction with Russia, which is skeptical about efforts in the U.N. Security Council to impose a third, tougher set of sanctions against Tehran for its refusal to halt its uranium enrichment programme.
The Hindu News Update Service

As you can see they have been very vocal. Europe has more to worry about than us.......they can be reached.

Have a good one!:s4:

[psychocat]

Well as a European I have to say my biggest concern is Americas constant threats to other nations , they come off as the global equivalent of the schoolyard bully.