Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
18067 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1.     
    #11
    Member

    Any other stoners of science?

    Quote Originally Posted by lildicedan
    i heard that if the smoke has to go through something e.g filter tips or water in a bong,
    When you use a bong the water will not absorb the THC since THC is not water soluble.Unless you have some kind of fat in the water(butter or something)

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #12
    Senior Member

    Any other stoners of science?

    There was an article in High Times a long time ago that said to slightly dampen the weed before lighting it. The combustion of damp weed is a little more effective than dry weed, but I never do this, haha.

    The most important thing is get the most potent weed you can, then just a couple of moderate tokes is enough, rather than 10 or 20 tokes to get the same high.

  4.     
    #13
    Senior Member

    Any other stoners of science?

    Quote Originally Posted by JstUseDaBong
    When you use a bong the water will not absorb the THC since THC is not water soluble.Unless you have some kind of fat in the water(butter or something)
    or alcohol

  5.     
    #14
    Member

    Any other stoners of science?

    dampening the weed will also create more smoke, and burn slower.

  6.     
    #15
    Member

    Any other stoners of science?

    I've kept my danketty dank in both mason jars and plastic baggies. I didn't notice any difference in taste or whatever, and the high was the same if it was in a glass jar. I stored it in the plastic baggy for probably... a month i'd say.

    Anyways, when I smoke bowls, I never put the flame right on the good stuff, i keep it about a millimeter or two above the ganj, then inhale slowly and let the flame JUST BARELY skim over the weed. This way, the heat doesn't come to it all at once, but comes gradually building up. THC has a lower "burning" point than that of weed, so for a split (very, VERY short) moment, it's only THC being burnt. Or at least thats what I like to believe. :thumbsup:

  7.     
    #16
    Member

    Any other stoners of science?

    hell yea, thats HOW you smoke dank.

  8.     
    #17
    Senior Member

    Any other stoners of science?

    This link is VERY useful... there is a lot of informations about the chemistry of the cannabinoids:

    Robert A. Nelson: Hemp Husbandry ~ Cannabinoid Chemistry (Ch 6)

    Good reading! :thumbsup::rastasmoke::stoned:

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Mad Science
    By McLeodGanja in forum Science
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-06-2008, 07:30 PM
  2. To the science majors/scientists/science geeks out there...
    By iwantFUEGO in forum GreenGrassForums Lounge
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: 10-30-2006, 04:41 AM
  3. I could tell who all the stoners were in my science class
    By AlwaysBlazed in forum GreenGrassForums Lounge
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-24-2006, 05:55 PM
  4. Science of THC
    By insanity in forum Marijuana Methods
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-14-2006, 09:09 PM
  5. Stoners Unite! More specifically, Alaskan stoners. You have some trouble.
    By beachguy in thongs in forum GreenGrassForums Lounge
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-12-2005, 03:40 AM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook