A few days ago Rush Limbaugh read some statements from some head of the news department of some big tv network/media conglomerate. He stated outright that less violence in Iraq "...is not news". Huh? :wtf: I hate everything about Bush, the neo-cons and this trumped up war, but fair is fair. If progress is being made, it should be reported.

...of course, there's always the fact that reporting on progress in Iraq would be disastrous for all those in government right now, regardless of their party affiliation. Americans may tolerate spending 100's of billions on a war, but if the hundreds of billions of dollars that are being spent on rebuilding Iraq were reported, most Americans would look around at our crumbling infrastructure, and the lame excuses our politicians come up with for why we haven't the money to rebuild, and suddenly you would see a groundswell of opposition to the Iraqi swindle from most Americans, regardless of their party affiliation.

Just think what we could have done for America with the money we wasted on Iraq.

PC :smokin:
PharmaCan Reviewed by PharmaCan on . Good News From Iraq Not Getting Reported On October 7, NewsBusters shared the astonishing statements of journalists from the Washington Post and CNN as to why good news from Iraq should not get reported. Two weeks later, the Iraq Interior Ministry announced: "Violence in Iraq has dropped by 70 percent since the end of June, when U.S. forces completed their build-up of 30,000 extra troops to stabilize the war-torn country." Such was reported by Reuters at 1:01 PM EST Monday. Not surprisingly, the major American media outlets Rating: 5