I don't trust her because she's a woman. I trust her because, of all the most viable candidates, her politics are most in line with mine. I also think she's smart. And I don't think she's any more of a liar than any politician. That's an easy-out characterization that people like to use because she's smart and consequently threatening.

What gives me pause about her is that I agree she's very much a Washington insider. She's also what's known as a "corporate Democrat," meaning she's as vulnerable to the influences of special interests and lobbyists as most Republicans are. But I still think she's an increasingly viable candidate, and I'll vote for her over one of the Republicans any day. Ron Paul would be nice, but he doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning any nomination. Hillary Clinton does.
birdgirl73 Reviewed by birdgirl73 on . Clinton considers giving up some powers NEW YORK - If elected president in 2008, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton would consider giving up some of the executive powers President Bush and Vice President Cheney have assumed since taking office. In an interview published Tuesday in Guardian America, a Web site run by the London-based Guardian newspaper, Clinton denounced the Bush Administration's push to concentrate more power in the White House as a "power grab" not supported by the Constitution. Asked if she would consider Rating: 5