Results 1 to 6 of 6
			
		- 
	10-23-2007, 06:10 PM #1 OPSenior Member OPSenior Member
 Ontario Judge Rules Cannabis Prohibition InvalidI have the pleasure of announcing an important legal victory. Today in an Oshawa Court, the trial judge in the 'Tom, Dick, and 
 Harry' case dismissed the charges against them, for simple possession of marijuana. He said that in his view the marijuana prohibition had no valid force or effect. In the lunch recess Justice Edmunston had read the judgement of Borenstein, J. which found the same conclusion in July, a judgement that our team had managed to get to his attention, with difficulty, against obstruction by the Crown prosecutor. He said the cases against Tom, Dick, and Harry, are dismissed because the law is not there to charge them or convict them. The exact terms of his decision will be available later, after an exchange of faxes with the Court house. So the marijuana law has fallen again. It seems bound to fall repeatedly whenever the Borenstein judgement is invoked. Justice Edmundston said that though he was not bound by the decision of Justice Borenstein (the two courts are 'parallel', viz. neither one issues judgements that are binding on the other), he was persuaded by it, and found that the law had fallen into invalidity. The precise point at issue in the Borensten ruling (the case of R. v.Lord) is that the 2003 December standing order which made it a policy to supply Health Canada schwag to those of us who are medically authorized was only a policy. Being only a policy, it wasn't good enough protection for those whose rights need to be protected (i.e.
 the sick among us); this means that the Medical Marijuana Access Regulations are unconstitutional, the entire prohibition falls, because the MMAR is the only thing propping up the prohibition from falling into obvious and undeniable invalidity / Therefore in my view the best public relations course is to call for a stay of all proceedings in Canada on this charge, together with a moratorium on arrests. I will be making a public call on the Prosecution service soon, to urge him to make this decision. The case of R. v. Lord has been appealed by the Government (the appeal was filed in August, but there was murkiness on this in court today), but no date has yet been set for this appeal in the Ontario Superior Court.LuciferN Reviewed by LuciferN on . Ontario Judge Rules Cannabis Prohibition Invalid I have the pleasure of announcing an important legal victory. Today in an Oshawa Court, the trial judge in the 'Tom, Dick, and Harry' case dismissed the charges against them, for simple possession of marijuana. He said that in his view the marijuana prohibition had no valid force or effect. In the lunch recess Justice Edmunston had read the judgement of Borenstein, J. which found the same conclusion in July, a judgement that our team had managed to get to his attention, with difficulty, Rating: 5This is my new dream
 My old dream
 This is Only A Fiction, with some pictures directly from my mind via USB 3.0 !
 
- 
	11-05-2007, 10:33 PM #2 Senior Member Senior Member
 Ontario Judge Rules Cannabis Prohibition InvalidVery interesting. 
 Another small step foward.
 Thanks for the post.
 
- 
	11-30-2007, 02:49 AM #3 Senior Member Senior Member
 Ontario Judge Rules Cannabis Prohibition InvalidWhat do you think of this? 
 
 
 Sell Marijuana Legally Book
 
- 
	01-15-2008, 04:10 PM #4 OPSenior Member OPSenior Member
 Ontario Judge Rules Cannabis Prohibition InvalidActually I don't know, I'll like to read it just to see but I guess it not that easy. For sure if you know someone that needs to use medical marijuana you could be the legal grower, this is the best solution to legally grow... I've been looking for someone and yet I didn't find any, maybe luck will be on my side one day. This is my new dream
 My old dream
 This is Only A Fiction, with some pictures directly from my mind via USB 3.0 !
 
- 
	01-15-2008, 07:45 PM #5 Senior Member Senior Member
 Ontario Judge Rules Cannabis Prohibition Invalidlucifer i know someone who is a medical user... so that means if i fill out some forms saying im growing for that person i can LEGALLY grow in canada?? Originally Posted by LuciferN Originally Posted by LuciferN
 
- 
	01-15-2008, 07:51 PM #6 OPSenior Member OPSenior Member
 Ontario Judge Rules Cannabis Prohibition InvalidYes this is right ! You lucky, I will even let you be more lucky and save you the trouble to go trought the health canada web site to find what you want, here is the link for the form to fill out: How to Apply - Applicants - Medical Use of Marihuana Originally Posted by jessem98 Originally Posted by jessem98
 In your case it will be form D "Application for Licence to Produce Marihuana by a Designated Person". Hope this help you out...This is my new dream
 My old dream
 This is Only A Fiction, with some pictures directly from my mind via USB 3.0 !
 
Advertisements
Similar Threads
- 
  Judge Rules Fed Ban on Gay Marriage UnconstitutionalBy Islandborn in forum Current EventsReplies: 2Last Post: 07-12-2010, 06:38 PM
- 
  6th Annual Highway 420 Anti-Prohibition Rally in Niagara Falls, OntarioBy highway420 in forum Current EventsReplies: 2Last Post: 04-16-2009, 10:01 PM
- 
  ONTARIO JUDGE RULES CANNABIS PROHIBITION INVALID!By KanMan in forum LegalReplies: 2Last Post: 11-10-2007, 04:33 PM
- 
  ONTARIO JUDGE RULES CANNABIS PROHIBITION INVALID!By KanMan in forum Current EventsReplies: 3Last Post: 10-20-2007, 05:47 PM
- 
  US judge rules wiretaps illegalBy Great Spirit in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 08-17-2006, 06:37 PM









 
 
 
 
					
					
					
 Register To Reply
Register To Reply
 Staff Online
  Staff Online