U.S. Troops Are Dying, So That Bush Can "Save Face!"

[delusionsofNORMALity]

....i probably should reply

Bush took an oath to protect and defend the United States from all enemies, both foreign and domestic.

In the simplest terms, he has breached his oath of office by allowing our country to be invaded by Mexico. Does this rise to treason? I suppose it would take a lawyer to answer that. Is it treacherous? I think it is quite clear that it is.

PC :smokin:

though he may indeed intend to aid the reconquista movement, he has committed no act that could be seen as furthering that cause. even if you could manage to make that case, you'd have to make room for most of both houses of congress in the adjoining cells. the only reason the amnesty bills haven't passed is the unprecedented public outcry opposing them. it's almost enough to make me believe that american democracy is working. almost, but not quite.

That's been going on since before the days of Reagan, so how is it Bush's fault?

Have a good one!:s4:

speaking of reagan. we probably could make a case for treason with that bastard. his '86 irca paid lip service to enforcement and set the stage for the amnesty battles we are going through today. i kinda wish hinckley's aim had been a little better.

delusionsofNORMALity Reviewed by delusionsofNORMALity on 10-23-2007. U.S. Troops Are Dying, So That Bush Can "Save Face!" :thumbsup: Rep. Bob Filner (D-CA), on Oct. 17, 2007, on Capitol Hill, said: â??Thousands of kids are going to come back in caskets, , which we are not allowed to see, or with amputations, brain injuries, with traumatic stress.â?� Why? Rep. Filner answers: â?? is going to make the Democrats take responsibility for â??this thing.â?? That is to â??save his face.â??â?� I say: Let Bush â??save faceâ?� in prison, with V.P. Dick Cheney, as his cell mate! I say treason send them to prison in Iraq Rating: 5