Yes, he did. Graph....you are talking to a veterinary tech. In my view people are ALWAYS responsible for animals....it is what comes from being able to make the kind of choices that an animal cannot. We are responsible. He ignored that.....and saying the dog was going to die anyway doesn't mean a damn thing. I'm going to die anyway.....so letting me die when you could do something about it is ok? Sorry....doesn't fly in my book and I think you will find that that will be the overwhelming public viewpoint as well.

The HUMAN had the choices. The animal had none. The one the haman made was cruel and if affected an innocent animal in a very cruel way. That makes him a cruel person period. Anyone who says they can justify cruelty is simply trying to rationalize their own poor behavior instead of doing the work involved in keeping your morals up to standard. It really IS as simple as that.

And if he was so hot on the plight of animals.....why didn't he starve himself instead of the dog? That would have made some news as well.

If he goes to jail for a few years; comes out and says it was worth the price I may reconsider....IF he's willing to suffer the same way he lets his "art" do.