The Historical Jesus: Fact or Myth?

[kronick]

I think he was saying that you have no right to say that what you believe is the truth.

I disagree to some extent, but I also agree.. I mean, you should and you do have the right to say whatever you want, but then again, nothing is ever %100 true.. Nothing that we think we know can ever be %100 proved, and no matter how much we believe it, it still may be wrong.. So to say that what we think is definately true is kind of arrogant. I see what he's trying to say.

But then again (again) to say that nothing can ever be proved to be %100 true is also just as arrogant, because it's can't be %100 proved that nothing can ever be %100 proved.

you may have a point but 1+1= 2....and that is 100% proven...so some things can be proven...and others...just cant


flesh...im sorry if i offended you...i just couldnt explain it as good as ghostoker did... :P

kronick Reviewed by kronick on 02-06-2005. The Historical Jesus: Fact or Myth? Ok, we all know that the Church tells us that Jesus really did exist, that the Gospels are historical documents and should be taken at face value. But are they indeed historical? Did Jesus really exist? Does it matter? Simple answer to all 3 questions: No. Here's a passage from a book I've been reading, called The Pagan Christ written by Tom Harpur, a former Anglican priest who teaches Theology at the University of Toronto. "Can we say with any authority that Jesus of Nazareth Rating: 5