Republicans Object To Stark Comments On War

[Psycho4Bud]

I never said it was recent I am simply pointing out that from the very start it has been about MONEY!

Your defense of "well that happened earlier" really doesn't wash does it ?

The past defines the future ...

Actually it does wash........when the Coalition Provisional Authority was in charge, the time frame your referring to, it was up to the U.S. to assign the contracts. Now if a person was corrupt, such as the Major your posted about, they should be prosecuted like he was.

"Past defines the future", it's the Iraqi Government that sets up contracts now.......not much to do with us or you wouldn't see deals with Iran, China, etc...taking place.

Have a good one!:s4:

Psycho4Bud Reviewed by Psycho4Bud on 10-23-2007. Republicans Object To Stark Comments On War (The Politico) House Republicans objected today to comments made by outspoken liberal Democratic Rep. Pete Stark of California on the Iraq war during debate on the override of President Bush's veto of the children's health program. Speaking on the House floor, Stark said, "Under the Republican plan, by 2017, we probably will have killed 20,000 soldiers in Iraq, spending $200 billion." Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) rose to protest the remark and asked that Stark's words be taken down, a Rating: 5