I seriously am starting to get bored of this thread alongside probably many others.

So ill be brief.

When you learn what evolution means, you won't make these kinds of assumptions.
I know exactly what evolution means, it is a process of development, a process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage.

Okay, now I think YOU should understand that the evolution I am talking about is on an extremely macro evolutionary basis and considering human evolution with regards to DARWINIST ORTHODOX evolution (you know, the one they teach in schools?), not just 'change'.

I mentioned this in my previous post, please read it thoroughly.

Why not consider it? There's nothing wrong with considering things but science that is taught in class rooms shouldn't be based on suppositions.
well, I dont think it is fair to call intelligent design a superstition, you need to understand the meanings of words before you enter these debates.

Your pertaining to the belief that we "consider" intelligent design through fear and ignorance, I dont call atleast the process of giving careful thought to something to be labelled an act of ignorance and fear.

I consider an intelligent designer, not because I am scared of the wrath of this intelligent designer (it could have died many a thousand year ago) but because I am open minded enough to hold the consideration of it.

Respect it and move on newbie.

From what I've read, we have a common ancestor with apes, if that's what you mean. I think this is based on solid fact, yes.
What your forgetting is that there is a missing link to show the evolutionary path between ape and human, and even so, the 'proof' you have described brings up many other new theories such as co existence.

This is why I said, do not presume evolution is 100% correct, the more evidence they find the more theories they open, and a strong theory by modern scientists is co existence.

I remember watching a documentary a while ago, a few years back (about 3) about this Brazilian archaeologist who was excavating in Peru, she found dinosaur footprints alongside man footprints and suggested that man literally walked with dinosaurs and co existed with them.

This is a very brief overview (im very tired) but may that not mar the authority of this description, this archaeologist lost her job, her research funds and her entire team was split up due to the finds. Simply because it went against the universal held 'truth' and assumption that we evolved from these ancient mammals.

Now. This is no superstition, so lets consider it lol.

I mentioned it because you brought up silver reflective skin, a detriment. Adapting silver skin would be devolution.
Well it depends on your interpretation and perception of this silver like skin, I mean if I was to wrap you in foil and send you out into the sun im sure it would not be very effective.

Is this the kind of work you believe can be linked to the likes of natural selection and billions of years of evolution.

This was my point, you can percieve the skin to be a magical absorbing material which calculates perfectly the correct amount of vitamin D and sunlight for the skin to be exposed to etc, which would be more fit a suit for survival.

Or you can look at it from the foil example.

Ill give you 3.8 Billion years to think about it.

From what I've read, we have a common ancestor with apes, if that's what you mean. I think this is based on solid fact, yes
So humans came from apes. Right.

Sorted, forget EVERYTHING ELSE.

Because our species originated in Africa.
Right, and what about the blisteringly cold nights of Africa?

This is why I said, fur would fluctuate in its tenacity, it would keep you cold as well as warm.

Which brings me to ask you the question.

Why donā??t all animals lose their fur in Africa then? Maybe its because they donā??t live by the stereotype that Africa is a burning hot continent 24 hours a day 7 days a week.

Newbie, loss of hair is not an unmixed blessing in regulating body temperature because the naked skin absorbs more energy in the heat of the day and loses more in the cold of the night.

You could have come up with a million better answers than the ones you give me, how about simply - vanity? or changes in human DNA - how about these?

There is no clear cut reason why this happend but there are certainly better theories than the ones you can come up with.

One has proof (evolution or "change") and one is just a supposition.
What did I say at the very start of this thread?

I said that evolution is good at explaining how lower life forms can form into more adapted 'higher' life forms, I agree with this, I also agree with evolution, there is nothing wrong with me coming here and hitting points out into the open about theories I may agree or even disagree with.

Im just saying be it the ignorance of many to pertain to the belief that studying evolution means that an intelligent designer could not have possibly created us or had any intervention on any level with our genes or anything of the kind is ignorant!

Why - when orthodox evolution be taught in school must we rule out intelligent design? There is no proof of intelligent just as their is no disproof of it, to remove it completely and then 100 years down the line realise it could actually be viable after all and co existence was true (and evolution) would be an embarrasing situation!

The truth is that Gods were invented to explain what was the unexplainable (astrology at the time ). The Christian God and Jesus were no different. Infact most Christian beliefs are stolen from ancient myths and astrology
I wouldnt say stolen, perhaps an exact copy with a different name, I mean if you look into the similarities of jesus and horus im sure you will be suprised.

These religious beliefs all date back to planet worship, allah was a female goddess (Allat) in Arabia - the God of venus which is represented by the 5 pointed star, one of the reasons muslims have 5 pillars of islam and prayer 5 times a day.

But a muslim will obviously tell you different :wtf:

The Bible is an adaptation of ancient astrology, surrounded by myth, rewritten several times to fit in with current morals and thought. Written as a system of control to gain power over the people.
I dont mean to offend anyone but when you look into all of this, the middle eastern crisis and the political powers of control, you will find it is all to do with drugs and money and power.

Its as simple as that.

Please do not come here talking about the vatican on some moral highground, your also talking about one of the worlds richest busineses, a business that would behead (in the name of christ) you if you were not its serving 'customer'.



Source, please.

I'd love to sit here and spend 3 hours replying to your 3,283,298,139 character post, but you're starting to bore me with saying the same old things over and over again (rephrased, mind you).
Im not asking you to respond, and clearly your only touching on about 5% of my post yet still lacking a reason to do so lol.

What are you trying to debate with me about?

YouTube - Fossil Skull Discovery Pt.1

Show us these lengths at which it goes to, to support intelligent design. I'd love to see this.
YouTube - Fossil Skull Discovery Pt.1

Well it's funny that you should make that assumption. I've never heard of "Carl Sagans: The Cosmos."
You must be 39 then.

Animals adapt to their environment...
Really?

lol

and that is essentially natural selection
So does that make japanese people more evolved than anyone else due to their serious lack of hair?

(This is an actual field of modern evolution thinking)

But it is certainly a much more viable option than intelligent design.
I didnt actually say it wasnt lol.

However, I believe the basic element of this whole thread is the validity of intelligent design...
Right... Okay...

But we know its not proven or disproven...

So what is the point in debating its 'validity' you either believe its true or you dont or you do neither (which is what I propose).

lol.

which you say you're not arguing about (even though I think it's pretty obvious you are).
Erm... Okay... So if I argue about my PC brand being better than yours... lol..

Does that mean that I wont ever ever ever ever ever ever ever buy the brand of PC you have?

What if mine breaks down?

lol



Nope, never ruled out some kind of creator
Good. Done.

Though, I see no evidence for it,
I dont know, im sure last week I saw a fairy man flying through the sky creating people.

Too bad you destroyed that possibility with arguments like "we didn't evolve from rocks."
When did I say we didnt evolve from rocks?

Infact when, have I once outright disagreed with ANY theory which has been discussed here?

:wtf:

Oh... And I said there is NO PROOF for Abogenisis (That we evolved from rocks)

There is a difference between there being no proof and it being completely irrifutably untrue... C'mon, im sure your a proponent of this type of thinking lol.

Why do I have the right to link these things? Well, I have the right to say anything I please, as I have a mouth (or hands), and it allows me to say whatever I please.
Yes of course, like I have the right to be a profoundly conservative christian, indoctrinating my children and castigating the thought of sex with severe beatings, yet myself being a regular at the local strip club.

Your free to be a complete hypocrite

Sorry, but maybe you should take your own advice and think about your own beliefs as well.
HAHA, Ive been waiting for someone to say this.

mfqr... what beliefs are you referring to?

Believing that something "just happens" doesn't mean that one does not believe that there's a reason behind it.
Get this into your head, YOU EVOLVING FROM AN APE HAS NO EVIDENCE.

I may be the biggest proponent of evolution and still agree with this.

that's why. I've thought about it - about aliens possibly starting things up here... but is there evidence of this? No, so why would I sit here and claim it to be a viable option
Get your head out of the dumb sand, what dont you understand about 'not ruling' out - or how about I put it this way with the use of an advertisement.. AXXA PP life insurance... "BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS".

It's possible, as anything is, but it's not something that needs to be taught in school.
Have you got the attention span of a 3 year old?

What didnt you get about me saying "I DONT WANT IT TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS">?

That "basic change" is called adaptation, I believe
And what does the word adaptions mean?

= "Provisions for gradual or incremental changes"

...why?

Well, since you have corrected someone else's spelling mistake, I will tell you that the comma you placed was incorrect.
Correction, I did not correct any spelling error.

I simply pointed out that the word did not infact even exist.

So, before you correct mine, learn how to read.

When you mention aliens, you're just supposing. Coulda been boogy men, coulda been elves, coulda been magic, coulda been ghosts. Why mention the alternatives when they offer no more proof than any religion?
Yes, well done for understanding that when I mention aliens I dont mean THAT THEY DID IT FOR SURE.

Well done! Big achievement.:thumbsup:

Read my posts again, I know it could have also been a hairy man having a shit on a toilet who created us it doesnt matter WHAT GOD OR ENTITY YOU BELIEVE DID IT

But we are talking about intelligent design not who the designer was!

The reason I mention Aliens is that there are some foolish moronic idiots that actually think EVERY single tiny thought of intelligent design will lead to religion.

And it "Coulda* been intelligent design".

*Thats also a spelling mistake - and a word that does not exist - SUE ME.

:thumbsup:
Fallen_Icarus Reviewed by Fallen_Icarus on . Some front line views of the war against God. After reading some here I felt this fitting, not so much as a reply but as a dedicated thread. There is a real spiritual war out there against God, and the forces involved know that the "Family", "The Mind", and "Journalism/education" is major spiritual high ground to take. EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed If you have a question about his intellegence and view please note this in His Bio Link below: "He graduated from Columbia University in 1966 with honors in economics and as Rating: 5