ok first let me state i am an artist not a scientist.
i have question: radio carbon dating is the prossess of messuring the amount of decay that has taken place in cabon 14 correct? so if there is more carbon 14 then wouldnt that make something look younger than it would older? also if only a lving thing can absorb carbon 14, wich it quits doing at the time of its demise, what would it matter if the levels were higher now? i just cant see the argumnt with the inrease in the level now as aposed to the past. because from my understanding carbn 14 degrades into a nitrgen atom and that specific atom can be messured there by giving you an amount of carbon in the atmosphere at the time. i would say without a shadow of a doubt that this is not the first time i history that atmospheric carbon levels have changed.

one other thing i would like to say is that i DID in fact study creation in school. being an artist i studied many forms of art one being litterature. i studied the creation "theory" right in the class where it belongs.mythology. because that is exacly what it is. a myth.
i had to right a paper on the differant gods once, well the subject i chose some would call sacrilage. my paper was titled "the death of god" . simply put is the fact that a hindu beleives as strongly in the existance of shiva as a christian believes in the existance of "god". same with all religions the greeks believed as strongly in their gods as any one else. but now these gods are "dead". why? thats easy people quit believing. so what brings these gods into being? same thing, belief. so it is within mans power to create or destroy a god or to give him power or make him powerless. so if there were no christian or jews there would be no god ,if there is no god then he could not have created us, it is a myth. and myths are not science. i am by no means an atheist i beleive in the oldest of all religions, nature. that is what created us.