Quote Originally Posted by dragonrider
There is no way to understand the emergence of new strains of drug-resistant germs or pesticide-resistant insects than by understanding the physical mechanisms of evolution.
Microevolution isn't debated by most creationists. This is a perfect example of microevolution, where certain changes tend to evolve within a species. I'm a creationist, and I won't deny it...but even I will admit that mutations are possible within a species. But I have a hard time believing in macroevolution when all of the transitional fossils that you speak of are nowhere to be found. Even though they're supposed to be everywhere. Darwin even stated that in order for his theory to be proven scientifically, there would need to be proof in these transitional fossils. So, why are we unable to find any? I find it hard to consider this science when the definition supposedly is the systemic knowledge of a matter, based around what is gained from experimentation & observation.

Nevermind that, why am I ridiculed for believing what I do when there's this huge flaw in the theory that humans evolved from lower primates? It's a nice theory, yes...but, then again, so is the theory that we are created in God's image. It's hard, as a person of faith, to honestly believe that my Lord was an orangutan God before he evolved into a God in human form!