Well, no, nothing has to be proven to be true. Did gravity have to be proven before it existed? It just has to be proven for you to understand and accept it as truth.
Firstly, im not saying things have to be proven for them to exist, that doesnâ??t make sense because elements of life exist which have not been proved yet - like conscious air, or intuition etc etc.

Read what I wrote again, im just saying teachers should ATLEAST tell students that evolution has still to be proven to be true, there are numerous missing links and Darwin also stole much of his work from his Grandfather (not that this has anything to do with the validity of the theory of evolution) - Evolution births ideas such as eugenics - which im sure you understand has resulted in some horrid experimental catastrophes - teaching that intelligence is in a blood line and power is in a blood line is not morally correct.

Evolution itself has no morality - Richard Dawkins - a profound evolutionist has spoken of the complete lack of morality in terms of evolution.

And if you donâ??t prove anything, then your basis is only a hypothesis - what if the theory of gravity was in actual fact - not right? It was only shown to be true when it was PROVED.

Your correct in a sense, but its a question of odds, often some theories just happen to be true once proven, some people create good theories, yet there are theories LIKE EVOLUTION OF US which needs to be proven true because - they may just be wrong.

Sorry to ramble on, I hope you understand my point.

Of course things do not have to be proven for them to exist but it would be nice to know if we actually did evolve from lower form animals into higher forms without any intervention, I was just saying people should not automatically rule out intelligent design as they do in schools, because they dont even give the kids an option (this is all I was saying).

There should be a balance in our schooling system by which children in science classes are still told that evolution is not proven IN OUR STORY (because it simply is not) there are numerous missing links blah blah.

Your American schooling system does not teach the benefits of communism and socialistic Governing im guessing?

I do so love these intelligent design discussions.

As a Pastafarian or follower of the Flying spaghetti monster I feel it is important that my religion be taught so others can be "touched".

Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

As stories of the bible are told at the beginning it should be said that nothing of the existence of Jesus Christ can be proven.

The same applies for the theories we teach our children of evolution.

They should know that it is as much BULL$%$ÂŁ a theory as the flying spaghetti monster. AND intelligent design.



"Intelligent" design isn't based on facts or evidence,
Well, neither is evolution when you try and explain our existence.

I noticed someone speaking of 2 theories to choose from?

Creationism or evolution?

How about a combination of these?

Perhaps we were created and designed and engineered to evolve at such a rapid rate compared to our cousin animals whom according to evolutionists such as Dawkins have also been on the same evolutionary path as us.

If we can genetically engineer animals, and considering the size of the universe (and the probability of the existence of intelligent 'aliens') then why cant they also engineer "animals"? (us).