I originally asked whether 4 bowls of reg will get you higher than 1 bowl of generic chronic. Is anyone of that opinion?

From the answers that were given, am I to understand that the high from better quality bud is better or different in some good way? So even if it doesn't get you proportionally as high, the high that you do have is better? If so, in what ways is it better? Describe the difference of highs basically.

As was mentioned, most of what AZ gets is sativa, so AZ mostly gets "head highs" rather than "body stones", which I think is better anyways. I used to be big proponent of the chronic-only crowd, but after seeing over and over how much more one could get with reg and doing a little numbers game like I showed above, I'm definitely starting to question/change my stance. Enlighten me.
The White Monk Reviewed by The White Monk on . Reg vs Dank Out here in AZ, we generally experience two "kinds" of bud - "reg" and "dank". Reg being bud with seeds and dank being the seedless sticky. Rarely have I met anyone who mentions any sort of specific strain, and to be honest, barely any of it ever looks unique (i.e. colored hairs, white crystals, etc would be unique) so any distinction besides the ones I just gave don't really exist or apply here to any meaningful extent. Yes, the terms "reg" and "dank" are probably being misused somewhat in Rating: 5