Quote Originally Posted by Torog
What's so wrong for bringing Freedom and hope for freedom,to a part of the world-that has little experience with freedom ? Why do the anti-wars want to deny Freedom and hope,to millions of folks ? Why do the anti-wars,claim to be for human rights,when their opposition to the war,could cause much more suffering for women and children ?

Oh well..the anti-wars have their freedom..I reckon that's good enough for them.
the war in iraq wasnt started to free the iraqis, it was started on the false premise iraq had wmd's and was a threat to u.s security, neither of which turned out to be true so bush fell back on 'oh we did it to bring democracy to the middle east' (bullshit).
now since were in iraq i hope elections go good and they can develeop their army so u.s soilders can get the fuck out.
the condition of living in iraq was bad, most of the reason things were so bad was because of sanctions and corruption in the oil for food program. the mass graves that we found were filled over 10 years ago, so you cant say there was a on going massacar.

theres a few questions you have to ask before saying the war was worth starting to bring democracy to iraq:
but was bringing freedom to iraq worth 1000+ american soilders, billions and billions of dollars? was it our responsibilty to free them? why not go to war with countries with dictators worse than saddam? you say humanitarian reasons we went there, then why not in sudan where theres a on going genocide? is america any safer now after we relieze the primary reason to go to iraq(wmd's) is found out not to exist? are the iraqis any safer with terrorists blowing up iraqi police, soilders and innocent by-standers?