Results 1 to 10 of 12
-
10-03-2007, 10:51 PM #1OPSenior Member
Bunghulio
With Iraq war spending reaching a half a million bucks a minute, the great dictator Bush vetoes a bill that would help 10-20 million kids afford medical treatments. Can anyone get rid of this beast, this multi-horned devil known as Bush.
medicinal Reviewed by medicinal on . Bunghulio With Iraq war spending reaching a half a million bucks a minute, the great dictator Bush vetoes a bill that would help 10-20 million kids afford medical treatments. Can anyone get rid of this beast, this multi-horned devil known as Bush. Rating: 5
-
10-03-2007, 11:59 PM #2Senior Member
Bunghulio
Originally Posted by medicinal
Since the Constitution doesn't explicitly give the Federal government the authority to be a health care provider to the people and the 10th Amendment states that any power not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, the authority to provide health care is reserved to the States respectively, or to the people, the President was correct with his veto.
Amendment [X.]
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Kick Out The Jams, Motherfucker!
MC5, Detroit
-
10-04-2007, 12:06 AM #3Senior Member
Bunghulio
The only reason 10-20 million kids were added to this health-coverage bill is because they raised the income limit to somewhere around $80,000 a year. I watched Nancy Pelosi try and explain this away and she just gave some vague explanation that really didn't say anything; kept repeating something about "not excluding 10-20 million children" when the question was clearly put; why are the kids being added to the coverage-list just those from wealthier families, not from poor uninsured families who really need it.
-
10-04-2007, 12:06 AM #4Senior Member
Bunghulio
You mean the health care plan that jacked the Fed tax on smokes to a buck a pack? Way to go G.W.!:thumbsup:
Have a good one!:s4:
-
10-04-2007, 01:00 AM #5Senior Member
Bunghulio
But we can send billions to Israel without a wimper, what shame....
-
10-04-2007, 11:15 PM #6Senior Member
Bunghulio
Regardless of whether or not one agrees or disagrees with the current military action in Iraq, it is more in line with the Constitutionally assigned duties of the Federal government than is being a provider of health care to the masses.
Kick Out The Jams, Motherfucker!
MC5, Detroit
-
10-04-2007, 11:24 PM #7Senior Member
Bunghulio
Originally Posted by eg420ne
For the most part, Israel has been a valuable ally in the region and is the only country in that region that has a freely elected government.
Kick Out The Jams, Motherfucker!
MC5, Detroit
-
10-04-2007, 11:44 PM #8Senior Member
Bunghulio
This is one of the few things Bush has done that I have agreed with.Middle class America can afford they're own healthcare.
-
10-05-2007, 12:13 AM #9OPSenior Member
Bunghulio
I thought constitutionality would have prevented Bush from doing a number of things, like wiretapps, repealing Habeas Corpus, Hiding facts from the congress and outing a CIA agent to start, lets not even get into the illegal Iraq war where he spends as much in a week as this program would have cost in a year. Unconstututional my ass.
-
10-05-2007, 01:08 AM #10Senior Member
Bunghulio
Originally Posted by Iguana
Israel who needs enemies...I wont get into the spying and duel-citizenship Israel pulls on us, Israel even attack one of our Ships, but i guess its ok
http://boards.cannabis.com/conspirac...-spy-ship.html