Results 1 to 10 of 43
Threaded View
-
03-06-2009, 07:47 PM #38
Member
New manned missions to Moon, Mars --- what do you think?
First off I'm pretty sure I got more brains than a rock, seeing as how a rock is inanimate and non-living and all.
Secondly I doubt we'll make it to mars, not this time around anyway. Mars would require a massive investment of resources, perhaps more than anything else ever before in the history of humanity. Don't think we got the discipline to pull that now.
The moon on the other hand is a known quantity, we know exactly what we're getting ourselves into here. Been there done that, the moon may also possess exploitable resources, making it an even better target, in addition to an easy target. A permanent off planet colony could be established within a decade, with material returns on the investment not long after becoming firmly established.
Not only that but the moon is safer, a crew en-route to, or already on it, is not beyond the abilty to rescue. A mars mission however would be.
Similar Threads
-
MARS OG A++++++
By bombdiggity in forum Southern CaliforniaReplies: 1Last Post: 10-18-2009, 08:27 AM -
US 'escalates covert Iran missions'
By texas grass in forum Current EventsReplies: 3Last Post: 07-21-2008, 09:58 PM -
The Mars Volta
By badfish2689 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 11Last Post: 08-24-2006, 11:27 PM -
If you believed they put a man on the moon, a man on the moon...
By GHoSToKeR in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 34Last Post: 09-23-2005, 02:36 PM -
mars.....
By naluman in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 9Last Post: 08-12-2005, 06:54 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online