Quote Originally Posted by psychocat
Use of Immanuel Kants oft misunderstood and contentious universalizability. Your spelling is incorrect.
How does that relate ?
Morals are not the question here.

Methinks you just enjoy talking cobblers !
I know my fair share on Deontological Ethics. Tomato, tomato

universalisability - universalisability from FOLDOC

Universalizability - Universalizability - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Z, is usually associated with Americanized spelling, i believe. You assume for some reason that I can only view things from my own perspective, while I can't see inside of yours and only through mine, i can understand others, even though I may not agree. Understanding your point of view and agreeing with you are two different things. My point is that i won't quit for anyone besides me, I am that I am, no one can forcefully change me, that goes against my human rights and liberty. They can attempt to persuade me, however the decision is ultimately mine.

Just because i believe this one thing doesn't necessarily mean i agree with all it's universal traits. If you catch my drift.

Anyway, since you like Kant, i'll leave you with his famous words:

I should act, so that i may will my maxim to be a universal law.