Does the past is real?

[palerider7777]

A pissing contest? I could have sworn it was a thread discussing things, must have missed that memo.

You state that there is one truth, only one, no matter what. Thats a fine statement, but one that can not be backed up with actual evidence.

Is there something wrong with spending your time trying to prove what you see around you wrong? Wouldnt you end up reaching the same "conclusion" as the one you have reached, assuming your beliefs are correct? If what they are trying to prove wrong is a truth, then its impossible to prove it wrong using any kind of sound logic, and the more time that a person spent trying to prove it wrong, the more they would realize that it wasnt wrong, no?

Is everyone, or even a majority, all blaming the same person/place/thing/item?

I am trying hard to avoid discussing any of your personal beliefs, as they have been discussed before, and its more then likely pointless to try to rehash that discussion. But is it safe to assume that your comments about ignoring the "one truth" and "blaming the 1 they dont believe in" are references to your beliefs and faith?

It is fine to use your beliefs as the basis for your point/arguement, its nigh impossible to not do so in some manner when having a discussion. Even stating that you believe something to be the truth in this world... but you are attacking and insulting others if you state that only your truth is the true one, and nothing else can exist. Thats what I am saying, and you may not have intended to come off like that, but I dont think I was the only one to read that from what you said.

Now as for your reasons for not wanting to dicuss this with me, personally I find them nothing but a bunch of bullhonkey, but to each their own. Id hope you would be able to handle having a discussion with someone who might not agree with what you believe. Id hope you would be able to have a discussion with someone without constantly harping on past subjects discussed, or past things said.

If thats not the case, then I apologize for wasting your time, and I will put you on ignore so that I dont accidently respond to anything else you post, as I dont really pay attention to who is saying what when I reply.

no im quite sure u knew who u were responding too don't play that card

[imitator]

no im quite sure u knew who u were responding too don't play that card

I still dont even know who you are.

I am sure you left me negative rep at some point in time considering your attitude towards me, but since they only let you view a limited amount, I cant see any from you. And without rep to some thread to give me a clue as to some discussion we had, all I know is that you have a dislike for me for some reason.

[Adjacent]

Descartes is rolling in his grave right now.

Cogito ergo sum, my friends.

[TheGreatBenzino]

kk ladies and gentlemen. this thread is SHIT! its over, done with.... the question is is the past real???? well i say NO. (what for?) cuase i dont care, it passed. so basically everything you wrote was fake cause it is now in the pass!

[imitator]

kk ladies and gentlemen. this thread is SHIT! its over, done with.... the question is is the past real???? well i say NO. (what for?) cuase i dont care, it passed. so basically everything you wrote was fake cause it is now in the pass!

So you are saying that since its already happened, it isnt real anymore?

And yes, I know, it was a troll on your part, but next time, at least learn how to spell PAST. S isnt even near T, so there is no excuse. :thumbsup:

[TheGreatBenzino]

Man, Your not even worth my time. you are the FIRST hater i have seen on this site. You will find anything, to bitch about. Your area must be dry....smoke a bowl relax.


oh and.....PAST!

[Reefer Rogue]

Je pense, donc, je suis.

How do we know that car is real? *dies*

[afghooey]

Some believe that our experience of time, one moment at a time, is only due to the fact that we cannot percieve the wholeness of time. In that theory, time is not really a series of moments strung together. All time --- past, present and future --- all of them exisit forever, and at the same "time." Time is just another dimension, like the spatial dimensions that we recongnize as space, but for some reason we experience time as a flow and can only percieve it a moment at a time. But in reality it exists in its entirety, just like space does.

I've been thinking about this, and it raises some interesting questions..

If the future already exists, what becomes of novelty, spontaneity, and choice? From our perspective of reality, our limited view of the fourth dimension, these things make sense. But if everything has already happened, so to speak, outside of the confines of our limited perspective, then our fates are already determined, no?

[Bluntmasterbabe]

Okay, is it just me, or is that title nonsense..."Does the past is real?"...must be a typo

As for the subject, I think its better for me to not respond is the spirituality section because I'd rather not get into an argument over religion. To each their own

[afghooey]

Okay, is it just me, or is that title nonsense..."Does the past is real?"...must be a typo

English is not Coelho's first language.

That said, he actually has better English skills than a lot of people who do speak English as their first language. :stoned: