"MySpace should come clean and admit that it is now following an official policy of censorship based on political affiliation, and that its readers are not left free to make up their own minds on the credibility of any particular story, but are intentionally prevented from accessing certain websites that MySpace deems contrary to the political agenda of its owner, Rupert Murdoch."

I agree with this part of the article. I also believe myspace has a right to censor whatever they want, but they should (not legally but as a moral obligation) show or list what websites they block and why.

I was in a very active group called, "The Bush is an Idiot Group" with about 15,000 members that suddenly disappeared. I don't know if it was the group leader or myspace.

Do the owners of myspace have a moral obligation because of their size and power? Yes, just as Wal-Mart does. Do they have a legal requirement to state who they censor and why? Absolutely not.
angry nomad Reviewed by angry nomad on . MySpace Censors Anti-War Websites MySpace Censors Anti-War Websites Prison Planet blocked as the model for government regulated Internet 2 gets a dry run Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Tuesday, September 25, 2007 Rupert Murdoch's MySpace has been caught in another act of alternative media Rating: 5