Quote Originally Posted by Delta9
Using a dog to sniff a car constitutes searching. And if the policed are allowed to search without a warrent it is a violation of civil liberties. They can search without a warrent. They can't it fucking do that bullshit, drugs are bad and trafficking narcotics is wrong and it is true that the police should work to stop the heroin and cocaine trade, but, they can't fucking search without a warrent. cannabis is not a fucking narcotic! stupid police. I met a bunch of forensic chemistry majors in college and they were such obnoxious bitches. I'm serious they would complain about everything, who the fuck complains about doing their job. Not only that administrators don't do shit except fill out paper work they sit on their asses and make like 60,000$ a year and really don't do shit. Stupid fat hoes.
Actually, it doesn't. Our courts have ruled you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the odors coming from your luggage, car, etc. So, a dog sniff isn't covered by our 4th Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizures. I'm not saying it's right, but that is the way the courts have ruled on it.
papaw Reviewed by papaw on . our Supreme Court ignores the 4th Amendment Recently our ultra conservative Supreme Court ruled that police can search your vehicle after pulling you over WITHOUT any probable cause. Holy fuck! Can you say fuckin' Nazis? I'm going to write a letter to those 9 pompus jackasses and let them know they are the worst. Civil liberties are being taken away from us and we have to speak up or they will only be written down on paper with absolutely no meaning. only Ginsberg wrote a decenting opinion. Rating: 5