Quote Originally Posted by ntcrawler
He was tased so they could get the hand cuffs on him. Did it not work? They could of risked injury on themselves and Meyer if they decided to wrestle with him. They could of just beat him with a baton until he submitted as well. They took the best route and he seemed fine when they took him out of the hall. My mind is free; it is yours that seems hung up.
You seem to be dismissing the fact that a bunch of cops were holding him down. With all that muscle power, why would they need to tase him? How could they not have handcuffed him without the taser? Your argument makes no sense. Your mind isn't free, you're supporting police brutality with the idea that "he could have hurt the cops, or himself." Explain that one, because last time I checked, they had him pinned down. Obviously he couldn't do a thing to hurt the cops. This is police brutality, and it is you who has been manipulated to support it.

"They could have just beat him with a baton until he submitted as well". Hypothetically speaking, if they didn't have tasers, would you have supported this course of action?

You clearly don't understand those cops (that's plural) holding him down already had him subdued, for the most part. It would have just taken a minute or two longer to get the cuffs on him. Oh, but of course, that's really inconvenient for the cops, right? So, if it's inconvenient for the cops to spend a little extra time to prevent the violent act of using a taser, then the person who committed the so-called crime should be tased. Is this right? I'm not sure, I can't really predict your arguments, because I have not been manipulated to support police brutality, and the impending police state.