Quote Originally Posted by ntcrawler
HAHAHAHAHA

First off, that had to be one of the funniest responses I've received. Now you are correct in calling that and over-the-top comparison but to answer your question I truly believe that it would be the supervisors/procedure that is too blame.
Thanks, I try. But personally, I'd blame the workers AND I'd blame the employers.

Quote Originally Posted by ntcrawler
Now I'm gonna give you a different scenario; They let him get up to walk out and he decides to run around the audience, pulls out a gun and starts shooting people. Now I'm not saying that scenario is likely but as a cop you have to plan for the unpredictable. If that did happen(or any event like it) their would be a media frenzy talking about how the cops were not doing their jobs and the needs for stricter security/procedure(less freedom). You would probably be arguing in this thread still against the cops!
If that's the case, then it's just safer just to tase and arrest the entire public. Anyone could be packing heat at any time...

As well, if someone got up to do jumping jacks (or something similarly out of the ordinary, and annoying people) should this person be tased for resisting arrest too? They didn't do anything remotely illegal, but they're expected to go along with the police because the police say so? That's bull.