I'm done here but thanks for the heated discussion all and sorry it went so far. Good bye for this thread hope to meet you all again in other threads and on the same side.
sd6515 Reviewed by sd6515 on . Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid A lot of people justify their belief in a certain religion by claiming that there is basically no difference between believing in religious texts and believing in commonly accepted historical texts. They'll say something like, "What's the difference between believing in the Bible and believing all the written accounts of the Civil War, for example? You choose to believe those accounts, even though you weren't actually there, just like I choose to believe in the Bible even though I wasn't Rating: 5