There is common ground in that I feel history is correct in that a man named Jesus once existed.

Sorry BG, I saw your moderation comment, but got booted from the server due to it being busy.

What common ground among agnostics? What is that in reference to?
JaggedEdge Reviewed by JaggedEdge on . Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid A lot of people justify their belief in a certain religion by claiming that there is basically no difference between believing in religious texts and believing in commonly accepted historical texts. They'll say something like, "What's the difference between believing in the Bible and believing all the written accounts of the Civil War, for example? You choose to believe those accounts, even though you weren't actually there, just like I choose to believe in the Bible even though I wasn't Rating: 5