Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid

[Hardcore Newbie]

LOL please you do not know and do not believe in anything that is the definition of an agnostic

agnostic according to the dictionary-An Agnostic [1] [noun] [OW] embraces a worldview in which the existence of deity is unknown or unknowable. Derives from the Greek agnostos, a = without, gnostos = known or knowledge. "Agnostic[ism] [CE] was coined by Professor TH Huxley in 1869 to describe the mental attitude of one who regarded as futile all attempts to know the reality corresponding to our ultimate scientific, philosophic, and religious ideas." ie undecided ie cant choose a side until your are decided i would listen to and defend my views to you if you were able to

Which dictionary? Right.

an agnostic by definition can not have an opinion on this so at least admit atheism before continuing

Sorry, I thought it was assumed in the spirituality boards that atheist pertained to spirituality and religion.

I am a theistic agnostic.

Hardcore Newbie Reviewed by Hardcore Newbie on 09-14-2007. Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid A lot of people justify their belief in a certain religion by claiming that there is basically no difference between believing in religious texts and believing in commonly accepted historical texts. They'll say something like, "What's the difference between believing in the Bible and believing all the written accounts of the Civil War, for example? You choose to believe those accounts, even though you weren't actually there, just like I choose to believe in the Bible even though I wasn't Rating: 5