if you are as weak as not being able to chose at least know your facts at a min. and not booged down this already heated thread with nonsense and un researched claims I mean please either do this or do not post if you can not claim faith either in or against you put yourself on an even higher level of requirement to even participate in this discussion
sd6515 Reviewed by sd6515 on . Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid A lot of people justify their belief in a certain religion by claiming that there is basically no difference between believing in religious texts and believing in commonly accepted historical texts. They'll say something like, "What's the difference between believing in the Bible and believing all the written accounts of the Civil War, for example? You choose to believe those accounts, even though you weren't actually there, just like I choose to believe in the Bible even though I wasn't Rating: 5