Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid

[delusionsofNORMALity]

wow thats just some crazy sh*t, I mean to not believe is fine but thats just some evil stuff .....

my reaction to a sudden revelation of the existence of god may seem drastic to you, but i see it as just vengeance for the centuries of abuse and apathy. the concept of making war upon the gods for their cruelty is not unprecedented in mythology and when battling an immortal the only real target would be its mortal minions.

can you honestly say that if your god came to you and demanded that you slay the unbelievers you would defy him? if so, i would say that your belief in his infallibility leaves a bit to be desired.

delusionsofNORMALity Reviewed by delusionsofNORMALity on 09-13-2007. Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid A lot of people justify their belief in a certain religion by claiming that there is basically no difference between believing in religious texts and believing in commonly accepted historical texts. They'll say something like, "What's the difference between believing in the Bible and believing all the written accounts of the Civil War, for example? You choose to believe those accounts, even though you weren't actually there, just like I choose to believe in the Bible even though I wasn't Rating: 5