Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid

[JaggedEdge]

well at second thought I guess you did answer the qustion. so I guess you would live your life a lie then, sence you said it was proven to you 100%. Well it is your right to live aganst
the truth.

What does that even mean? What truth? It was a hypothetical question.

You can't exactly prove anything with a hypothetical question. The bottom line is this, Christianity will never be proven to be 100% correct.

JaggedEdge Reviewed by JaggedEdge on 09-13-2007. Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid A lot of people justify their belief in a certain religion by claiming that there is basically no difference between believing in religious texts and believing in commonly accepted historical texts. They'll say something like, "What's the difference between believing in the Bible and believing all the written accounts of the Civil War, for example? You choose to believe those accounts, even though you weren't actually there, just like I choose to believe in the Bible even though I wasn't Rating: 5