Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid

[sd6515]

Fallen, there is evidence of a man named Jesus existing, the same Jesus that is written about in the bible. As for his divinity, there is no proof, but to deny he ever existed...? Simply wrong.

Jagged,:thumbsup: Ignorant people is all. I have no problem accepting listening and discussing as we have jagged but will no longer waste my time with fallens ignorance. I accept that not everyone should or does believe in his divinity but they can't just out right deny his existance I would never fault anyone for not being a believe but this outright ignorance is unbelievable.:jointsmile:

sd6515 Reviewed by sd6515 on 09-11-2007. Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid A lot of people justify their belief in a certain religion by claiming that there is basically no difference between believing in religious texts and believing in commonly accepted historical texts. They'll say something like, "What's the difference between believing in the Bible and believing all the written accounts of the Civil War, for example? You choose to believe those accounts, even though you weren't actually there, just like I choose to believe in the Bible even though I wasn't Rating: 5