there are so many of the events in the Bible verified by the romans that it makes the entire rest of your argument based on misinformation and therefore just your opinion
Can you source this? Otherwise I believe this is of your opinion.

I dont believe there is any probable evidence of the existence of Jesus Christ.

but physical evidence has been found by arceologist
And what evidence is this? A frozen boat in the arctic you believe belongs to Noah lol.

And please name some archeologists you are referring to

I mean to actually say that there is no evidence of the crucifixion is ridiculous
Is there evidence of the crucifixion? Please prodive it, do not assume there is.

And i want you to make me BELIEVE that the crucifixion happend with this evidence.

it is recorded by the very people you say didn't record it and that IS a verifiable fact.
Any chance of showing me any of this, you seem to have the ability to prove the existence of jesus, im suere there are a few others that would like to see this



at least makes sense and supports his statements with facts
Yes and you are certainly following that law lol



And then you say....

After all of this...

But trust me
LOL

you can truly believe and accept as fact that the crucifixion did happen
OKAY THEN... ALL HAIL JESUS CHRIST...
Fallen_Icarus Reviewed by Fallen_Icarus on . Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid A lot of people justify their belief in a certain religion by claiming that there is basically no difference between believing in religious texts and believing in commonly accepted historical texts. They'll say something like, "What's the difference between believing in the Bible and believing all the written accounts of the Civil War, for example? You choose to believe those accounts, even though you weren't actually there, just like I choose to believe in the Bible even though I wasn't Rating: 5