Argument made by religious people that just isn't valid

[sd6515]

I seem to have jumped the gun in agreeing with SD, here.

Upon further research, I have come to the conclusion that Fallens questioning of the actual existence of Jesus is not ignorant in the least. It is an uncommon view, even amongst scholars, however there are reasonable reasons as to why some believe he was nothing more than a mythical creation.

Here is one interesting fact I found.

Only one out about forty Roman Historians in the 1st and 2nd century CE mentioned Jesus.

With this and other information I have found, there is reasonable cause to question the existence of Jesus.

Fallen, I apologize.

SD I feel you need to retract your comment regarding Fallen being ignorant.

to this I must request you look at all post by fallen and you will soon see he just likes to play devils advocate and insult for the most part.
I know that all/most events in the Bible can not be proven and that is why religon calls upon faith which is every persons right to except or reject.
religion is everyones right to have or reject and defend in that manner but this will always cause a heated debate and one should know this before they begin as for retracting calling fallen ignorant I do not retract that because even though he did have some valid points most of his points about 90% were taken out of there original context to support his beliefs. but to each there own and to john kerry i mean jaggededge just because you found a source that makes you change your mind instantaniously and do not stand behind your convictions does not mean I am the same way.