Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
11686 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 60 of 60
  1.     
    #51
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    ok then, well if you really think im bullshitting just ask me to post the pic, and then you could see my weed is better. hahaa -only if you really cant just take my word.
    i wasn\'t using my civil liberites anyways.

  2.     
    #52
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    BONGS are the healthiest way to smoke.....the water filters out a vast majority of the tar, and it does a good job of cooling the smoke. in fact, other chemicals are filtered out too, but not the thc. the BONG is also the best way to conserve your weed and get your maximum stone on. just remember to never burn more of the bowl than you can inhale in one lungful. be efficient. change water frequently.
    I wouldn't be so sure about that, sorry for all of you bong smokers but as I mentioned previously it is not known whether filtering the smoke through water is much healthier than smoking from a joint or pipe. Studies that have been done on this tend to show that bongs are also filtering THC so smokers have to inhale more to reach the desired effect. Also note that the more direct flame applied to the material, the more toxins released, when you apply flame directly to a bowl it is being heated more than say a cherried joint.

    The link below shows the results of a MAPS-NORML study on seven smoking devices which include vapourizer, joints, pipe and different types of waterpipes/bongs.
    http://www.maps.org/news-letters/v06n3/06359mj1.html

  3.     
    #53
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    vaporizing has 1% of the carcinogens smoke does. In fact, correctly done, vaporizing will produce nothing more than THC vapor. It's not THAT hard to use one, and it's way better than a bong for your lungs.

  4.     
    #54
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    Quote Originally Posted by slipnslide087
    ok then, well if you really think im bullshitting just ask me to post the pic, and then you could see my weed is better. hahaa -only if you really cant just take my word.
    Are you still here, jese man take some drugs and be happy, stop trynig to get into an argument with someone over the internet, lifes to short.

  5.     
    #55
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    i probably was sober in those....i dont knoe man,,,,
    i wasn\'t using my civil liberites anyways.

  6.   Advertisements

  7.     
    #56
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    Quote Originally Posted by HeLTeR.SKeLTeR
    I don't get it, why do you limit the strains on your body to then have to quit smoking or start suntanning?


    I don't know, I'm rather confused by what you said...
    ...i'm rather confused by what you said . Sunscreen isn't suntan lotion... sunscreen blocks harmful UV elements from the sun's rays. and that other thing you said... well i couldn't find any cohesion to it so i can't really answer (since i don't know the question).

  8.     
    #57
    Junior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    Anyone plant your babies yet?

  9.     
    #58
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    does weed actually cause cancer

    my health teacher said that, and i think it's bs... i've never read anything about weed causing cancer. Sure, smokin weed isn't good for you... but it's not significantly bad. If you smoke a couple times a week, you arn't doing much harm



    Anything posted on cannabis.com by the user \"ozzBozz\" is purely fictional

  10.     
    #59
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    No, weed isn't grown with the same radioactive fertilizers as tobacco. It's not tar or anything like that which causes lung cancer, it's the radioactive tobacco.

  11.     
    #60
    Senior Member

    false pro-marijuana facts?

    Quote Originally Posted by ermitonto
    No, weed isn't grown with the same radioactive fertilizers as tobacco. It's not tar or anything like that which causes lung cancer, it's the radioactive tobacco.
    No. While the polonium 210 found in tobacco is a suspected carcinogen, it is not known which of the three major known cancer-causing agents in tobacco is responsible for the majority of cancers. Polonium 210 exists naturally in many types of organic fertilizers in minute quantities, but for some reason, tobacco plants have a propensity for accumulating it. Weed doesn't contain any significant amounts of Po 210, but contains other suspected carcinogens. As with smoking tobacco, your risk of cancer from weed depends largely on your intake. It can be argued that the typical weed smoker is much less likely to develop cancer simply from the smaller amounts normally consumed. Cigarette smokers inhale much more smoke daily than the typical weed smoker.
    \"ATTENTION: Due to limits on my patience, I can only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow\'s not looking too good, either.\"

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Similar Threads

  1. Myths and Facts about Marijuana
    By Max Blast in forum Politics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-24-2011, 01:57 AM
  2. Marijuana facts from abovetheinfluence.com
    By Sweeney in forum GreenGrassForums Lounge
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-30-2008, 02:44 PM
  3. Marijuana facts
    By Eclipse1203 in forum GreenGrassForums Lounge
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-13-2007, 07:48 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-30-2006, 11:27 PM
  5. Marijuana Prohibition Facts
    By Psycho4Bud in forum Activism
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-15-2006, 06:14 PM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook