false pro-marijuana facts?

[Nullific]

If you smoke a lot of shitty weed maybe, with better quality weed you inhale less smoke so less potential damage. Theres still nothing in the hundreds of years that man has used marijuana to suggest that it significantly damages the lungs or rest of your body.
Higher incident of throat infection maybe, I personally have never experienced this problem.
It is also important to note that marijuana smoke does not cause emphysema because it does not effect the small airways like tobacco smoke.

[koshea]

dude...all i smoke is extremley high quality bud

[F L E S H]

I really don't think dank bud is any healthier than schwagg. The harmful elements in the smoke will harm no matter what.

[Reefer Rogue]

im with nullific on this one he knows his stuff. koshea what do u mean by lung problems exactly? do you smoke ciggarettes? do you exercise enough? i know smoke is bad for you in comparison to vaporizing but thers no actual evidence that proves that smoking weed can cause lung cancer because it goes down a different part of the lungs as opposed to tobacco.

[ermitonto]

I really don't think dank bud is any healthier than schwagg. The harmful elements in the smoke will harm no matter what.

I think you're missing the point. Of course there's nothing qualitatively different about the smoke, but with really good bud all it takes is a few hits of smoke to get a good buzz versus a couple joints if you have some shitty shwag. The difference is in the effects of a few puffs of smoke compared to a couple dozen lungfuls.

[ChickenHuntin]

In my past I've smoked shit that took me one hit to get high and i smoke all day everyday. If we all smoked shit like that, no one could accuse us of destroying our lungs. If someone says, "If you keep smokin' that shit, you're gonna give yourself lung cancer." we can say, "Yeah, maybe by the time im 250 years old."

[slipnslide087]

ok, well i only smoke really good weed, and its always out the bong. but when i get some better weed, i dont take smaller rips of it. i would would take huge rips of any kind of weed im smokin. i think most other people do that too. so to disagree with nullific, if i smoked a lot of shitty weed, that wouldnt be worse for my lungs than smoking a lot of good weed. thats straight bullshit. i dont know anyone who takes small hits just bc its good weed. thats not getting the whole effect, that would be a waste.

[Torog]

In my past I've smoked shit that took me one hit to get high and i smoke all day everyday. If we all smoked shit like that, no one could accuse us of destroying our lungs. If someone says, "If you keep smokin' that shit, you're gonna give yourself lung cancer." we can say, "Yeah, maybe by the time im 250 years old."

Howdy ChickenHuntin,

Well I'll be daggumed..what you said--makes sense..lol..it behooves the prudent toker..to toke the very best..rather than puttin your lungs to test....

Have a good one...Torog

[ChickenHuntin]

DUDE, WHEN ITS GOOD SHIT U DONT TAKE AS MANY HITS, YOU COULD SMOKE 2 GRAMS OF SHITTY ASS SHIT IN ONE SITTING WHILE U MIGHT ONLY TAKE LIKE 3 HITS OF REALLY GOOD SHIT, NO MATTER HOW BIG YOUR RIPS WERE IT WOULD STEAL BE A HUGE DIFFERENCE IN THE AMOUNT OF SMOKE, THUS THE AMOUNT OF TOXINS THAT ENTER YOUR BODY WOULD BE LIMITED.

[ChickenHuntin]

Thanks Torog