Quote Originally Posted by andruejaysin
I'm also a little curious why they didn't blame it on saddam and say all the highjackers were from iraq. That's where they wanted to invade, framing bin laden doesn't make much sense. But I'm making rational arguments in the conspiracy forum, I should know better.
Because they wanted to invade Afghanistan as well. Bin Laden is a scapegoat. They just wanted to get rid of Saddam for good, and control Iraq. But now they have two countries taken, and if they just blamed it on Saddam, they would need another reason to invade Afghanistan anyway. Also, if you think about it, Saddam would have easily been able to spread the truth that it was not him, if they blamed it on him in the first place. Bin Laden, in fact, was a CIA operative in the 1970s, and there are rumors that he still is in contact with the CIA and various rich families in the US. So it makes perfect sense that he would be used as a scapegoat, probably paid to "admit" it (remember, at first he denied it... but then he admitted it? that's strange, no?). Saddam would never do such a thing, because he hated the US, and our government hated him. He would do anything in his power to refute the false accusation of him doing it, like I said. I don't see how this is illogical. Perhaps you need to do a bit more research about 9/11, on the conspiracy side of it. I've done lots of research on both sides, and the non-conspiracy side just does no add up. It's pretty hard to make non-conspiracy arguments in a rational way, because it isn't rational, and doesn't make as much sense as the conspiracy side. Although I know you're not really arguing that, I'm just saying. You did bring up a good question, but now it's answered. Any more questions?

Just think... we go to kill "terrorists" in Afghanistan, right? Soon after, full attention was placed on Iraq. We have very small forces in Afghanistan, which was the original place to invade. Now we have like a hundred thousand troops in Iraq, because of "WMD's" that never were found, and the concept that Saddam was "harboring terrorists," which there was no proof found. The people in Iraq attacking our soldiers aren't terrorists. They're people defending their country as best as they can. They don't have the technology that we have, so they go to the good ol' suicide bombings. The agenda given to us was to invade one country, where they "thought" Osama was hiding in the mountains there. Nope... they never actually looked for him anyway, and I can promise you that. It's because he has ties with our government. Attention was blatantly shifted to Iraq.

And I am starting to think that the real agenda is to conquer the whole middle east. And, uhm, the whole world. Does the NWO ring a bell? The NWO could very well exist, and I am pretty sure it does. It's not like there are not people who are trying to conquer the world nowadays. Throughout history there has always been someone trying to conquer the world. The NWO (or I guess you could say The Illuminati) just uses different tactics.
mfqr Reviewed by mfqr on . 911- Planned by US government??? ok just to let you all know, im just an ordinary american, not crazy or anything lol. ok so my friend was tellling me about this video that proves that the US deliberately planned 911 as a way to have us americans in fear so that the government can totally control our lives. when i heard this i was thinking the samething you are right now, "yeah, ok....." so he gave me the website to watch the video on it. and here it is: Zeitgeist - The Movie, 2007 It's long, about 2 hours but just Rating: 5