Have you ever activated your weed?

[LIP]

I've tried it, and to me, no differnce. It actually seemed like harsher smoke for me.

I didnt expect it to work - and it didnt.

Not for me, that's for sure.

[imitator]

I've tried it, and to me, no differnce. It actually seemed like harsher smoke for me.

I didnt expect it to work - and it didnt.

Not for me, that's for sure.

Just curious, you normally smoke highs right?

[LIP]

Just curious, you normally smoke highs right?

High's in what context? High grade weed, or sativa dominant?

[slipknotpsycho]

actually when you heat it at a temperature lower than that which the thc and cannabinoids vaporize for a certain period of time it transforms alot of the non psychoactive thc into psychoactive thc. i have done this many times and had great results each time. the microwave is iffy, but throw your bud in the oven for 10 minutes at like 160 degrees you are set.

well that would explain our diffrencing in opinion, i was assuming yal were talking about 'activating it' at the same tempature as you would use to vaporize bud or cook with it....

i still don't think it'd really work (or make much of a diffrence), but if it's cooked at lower tempatures, it's alot more plausible..

[imitator]

High's in what context? High grade weed, or sativa dominant?

High grade weed.

Ive noticed the effects were much less noticable in high quality weed. I would imagine its because they cure it alot better, which means the conversion of THCA -> THC has already taken place to a large extent.

I have noticed a large difference when you are doing it to mids or lows, I have actually gotten completely wrecked off of two bowls of lows that were mic'ed, and most times I quit smoking out of boredom before I get that high on lows.

[slipknotpsycho]

High grade weed.

Ive noticed the effects were much less noticable in high quality weed. I would imagine its because they cure it alot better, which means the conversion of THCA -> THC has already taken place to a large extent.

I have noticed a large difference when you are doing it to mids or lows, I have actually gotten completely wrecked off of two bowls of lows that were mic'ed, and most times I quit smoking out of boredom before I get that high on lows.

well since i all i ever get are high-schwagg to low mids, i'll do my experimenting the next time i get some bud.. i shall post my results.

[Jouryokujin]

It's not a placebo effect, but if your bud is already well-cured this will do nothing.

[r0k]

BS.... if you could just activate weed, youw oudln' tneed to cook it in fat, you could just cook it then eat it... when it's heated (microwave, oven or by fire) it releases vapor that contains pretty much the only reason anyone even likes weed (cannabiniods, thc w/e) if there's not fat to capture it (vaporizer works on the same principal actually) it goes in the air and you don't get it, therefore you just wasted your weed..

it's placebo, period.

You're off on that one, buddy. When THC is heated up in the oven, it transfers vapors or whatever into the peanut butter. That's why it has to be organic peanut butter..

[slipknotpsycho]

You're off on that one, buddy. When THC is heated up in the oven, it transfers vapors or whatever into the peanut butter. That's why it has to be organic peanut butter..

er... and it has to be organic peanut butter why??? becuase of it's high fat content.... exactly what i said.

[nightlight]

well that would explain our diffrencing in opinion, i was assuming yal were talking about 'activating it' at the same tempature as you would use to vaporize bud or cook with it....

i still don't think it'd really work (or make much of a diffrence), but if it's cooked at lower tempatures, it's alot more plausible..

you smoke mostly mids right? i would strongly suggest this if that is the case.