Results 1 to 10 of 10
Threaded View
-
01-23-2005, 11:11 PM #9
Member
glass bubblers
http://my.marijuana.com/pipestudy.php3
Originally Posted by Climbing High
That's what I thought too, and it's logical, until I read this study.
So even though water doesn't have any fats for the THC to bond to, it still screens out more THC than tars/particulates, making it inherently ineffecient. I didn't like hearing that and it was dissapointing to me since I love bongs and bubblers, but it's a fact. Nothing outperforms regular joints/blunts.Disappointingly, waterpipes performed uniformly worse than the unfiltered joint. The least bad waterpipe, the bong, produced 30% more tar per cannabinoids than the unfiltered joint. Ironically, the pipe with the electric mixer scored by far the worst of any device. This suggests that water filtration is actually counterproductive, apparently because water tends to absorb THC more readily than noxious tars. Like the waterpipes, the cigarette filter also performed worse than the unfiltered joint, by about 30%. Researchers speculate this is because cannabinoids are exceptionally sticky and adhere to other solids. Hence, any filtration system that picks up particulates is likely also to screen out cannabinoids.
Similar Threads
-
Glass Tubes and Bubblers
By SOG420 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 5Last Post: 02-19-2006, 10:15 PM -
Thick Glass Bubblers $30, Glass Pipes $8, Glass Screens $5
By cheebashop in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 26Last Post: 09-07-2005, 01:41 AM -
Thick Glass Bubblers $30, Glass Pipes $8, Glass Screens $5
By cheebashop in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 7Last Post: 05-19-2005, 05:16 PM -
How do u tap holes in glass to make a glass bong without tubing?!
By Pestiferous in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 2Last Post: 12-04-2004, 11:52 PM










Register To Reply
Staff Online