There's a difference between having a different view on something because the facts support an alternate belief (ex: Person A votes for Obama because he supports universal health care while Person B votes against him since Obama supports the patriot act) and having a different view on something because your facts are wrong (ex: "Bush is supported by more than 50% of Americans so he's doing a good job"....when in reality its more around 30-40%...)or peripheral facts are being withheld (ex: "Bush didn't do anything illegal"...when in reality that's only because he changed the law so that none of his actions were illegal).

Supporters of Bush always seem to fall into the last two categories (I must admit there are a few that are in the first category and just don't mind being spied on illegally, don't mind our troops being killed senselessly since they're not the ones dying, don't have a problem with our school system because they aren't in school and neither are their kids, etc).

I've seen a lot of real facts from the Bush haters...The supporters have yet to show any...All they've shown was "Well one thing he did wasn't quite as bad as what another President did before I was born"...That's pathetic. I'm not being a dick. I honestly want to hear some facts of what Bush has done that makes him "not so bad." Considering all the negativity he's brought, he must have done something absolutely fantastic to make him not so bad right? The closest thing I've heard to a fact from a Bush supporter on this thread was "The war is legal"...well...that's not exactly true, and even if it was that wouldn't make it a good thing....