Quote Originally Posted by Delta9 UK
Evolution is a scientific theory - it is falsifiable, makes predictions, and yes I can happily prove it to be true - beyond doubt. Where would you like me to start? Microevolution or Macroevolution? Transitional fossils or Endogenous retroviruses?

Non scientists arguing about science is a recipe for disaster
If antirealism were correct, and nothing can meaningfully be said to exist unless it is observed by a conscious human being, then most of our commonsense beliefs and the most of science itself - such as the sciences of cosmology (to do with the Big Bang theory of the origins of the universe) and evolutionary theory (to do with the origins of the human species) - would have to be rejected.

Sciences that have to do with pre-human states of the universe would have to be rejected as false or even nonsensical.

-Ray Bradley
Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, Simon Fraser University
"The hope that new experiments will lead us back to objective events in time and space is about as well-founded as the hope of discovering the end of the world in the unexplored regions of the Antarctic."

Heisenberg
Nobel Prize Physics 1932
This award is administered by the Nobel Foundation and widely regarded as the most prestigious award that a scientist can receive in Physics.
Max Planck Medal 1933
The Max Planck medal is an award for extraordinary achievements in theoretical physics
Please cite the scientific journal that published the results of the scientific experiment that renders all of "QUANTUM THEORY" false because quantum theory renders your evidence nonsensical and it supescedes.