[QUOTE
Quote:
Originally Posted by natureisawesome
You're just a using your degree to bully me . "look , I have a degree. That' means I'm wrong and you're right."

harcore newbie:

"Look, I read the Bible, that means I'm right and you're wrong"[/QUOTE]

I have never used that arguement. I don't use the bible as evidence just because it's a book. I use the bible because it can be verified by, historical, archaeogical, spiritual, scientifica, astronimical, and other types of evidence.

sun is shining:

You know what's even easier to disprove than creationism? Christianity. SO much evidence that contradicts how the bible was truly written, where it came from...Blah.
You know how many times I've heard this? People say this all the time and give absolutely no evidence to back it up. It's just one of those ideas that people have been indoctrinated with like "nobody's perfect". Prove it. Christians give lots of evidence for creation, for the validity of the gospel and the torah and nobody heeds hardly a word, and then non believers come along and show you some old bones and a some fictional book saying that Jesus had sex with mary magdeline and some french girl is the holy grail and the whole world bows down.
natureisawesome Reviewed by natureisawesome on . Macroevolution examples Supporters of Creationism believe that there are no example(s) of Macroevolution - put simply most supporters of creationism don't believe that living things have become more complex over time. This is a broad generalisation but it will fit most peoples understanding of the concepts. From Wikipedia: Some Creationists have also adopted the term "macroevolution" to describe the form of evolution that they reject. They may accept that evolutionary change is possible within species Rating: 5